Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:56:30 +0200
That One Way Heroics game was totally worth it for R5. Must have played it
about 50 times already.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I contributed about 20 gigs
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:10:42 +0000
>
>
>
> What are we going to do about soundproofing the place?
>
> BTW, nice work on dodging the original topic. HOKAGE?
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 1:06 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> have it at jeeva's , theres enough room for everyone. just don't sleepover
> that place can get cold at night.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:52:55 +0000
>
> We still have a couple of weeks left. I just don’t want to get to the last
> minute and realise that I’ll be sitting at home watching it on stream with
> only Paas and my cats cheering.
>
>
>
> I think I’m going to take Friday off and see if I can actually finish all
> the Dangerous Dave games.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:48 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> I wasn't able to find a suitable venue :(
>
>
>
> Truth be told, it hasn't been terribly high on my list of priorities this
> past month, due to other pressing matters.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Uh, doesn’t Hokage refer to a specific kage – the fire one? Then you
> have raikage, misukage…
>
>
>
> I think your question should’ve been ‘Who is the fifth Kage from Jhb?’
>
>
>
> On an unrelated note, we still don’t have a venue organised for the Evo
> weekend, do we?
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:14 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> WHO IS THE 5TH HOKAGE FROM JOBURG
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:29:06 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Thanks fer the words of wisdom Nic. Much appreciated :)
>
>
>
> I didn't know that f+BD can hop over ground fireballs. That's really cool.
> Makes sense but it definitely wasn't something I picked up on.
>
>
>
> I'll remember that df+A is good for anti-airing purposes. I've only ever
> used it as a combo extender into argentine backbreaker *lol*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There's very little to teach you then, you've got the just of it.
> Your level up is strong.
> Ummm.....
> His EX gatling can be "free cancelled" into another special.
> He can finish launch combos with an air throw, like Mai.
> He can use the f+BD to hop over ground fireballs.
> df+A is a "good" anti air.
>
> ...that's all I got.
>
> On 30 Jun 2014 10:14, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've noticed :P I've actually been on the receiving end of it so I know
> how effective it can be :(
>
>
>
> Here's one of the throw setups I have (mid-screen):
>
>
>
> Argentine Backbreaker (with qcf+C followup), f+BD into super hop j.B,
> Argentine Backbreaker, rinse and repeat. It looks like Clark goes through
> (or just slightly above) the opponent during j.B and ends up on the
> opposite side.
>
>
>
> The recovery from the j.B is so quick that it appears that Clark is still
> airborne when the throw comes out. I can alternate between the B and D
> versions depending on the opponent's tendencies. Or I could just do nothing
> and see what happens. Came across it by chance when I was messing around
> with Clark's jumps and it seems to work quite well. Might have limited
> application against a wary opponent but it should be quite effective in the
> beginning :)
>
>
>
> I have yet to explore all of his options but that will come with time. I
> just need a functional Clark for now and I think I have that *lol*
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You should add this then.
> Standing CD
> Just do it when your opponent has been floored.
> It kills many wakeup attempts, and Clark is technically airborne during it
> too. Then you can cancel it with a F+BD and put the fear of god into your
> opponent with 3 special throw mixups, an EX machinegun combo, well pretty
> much all options he has.
>
> On 30 Jun 2014 09:37, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> LB sensei ftw *lol*
>
>
>
> I put Clark on the team for two reasons: Damage and LB's hatred of j.CD.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Exactly.
> LB with some good advice for a change.
> Good stuff.
>
> On 30 Jun 2014 09:28, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yup, that's the idea.
>
>
>
> Iori is the battery for the team. I'm glad LB suggested I play him because
> his confirms are really easy and lead to good damage. Ryo does ok with 2-3
> bars. Clark is an absolute monster with 5 and full drive meter. His range
> is an issue but at that point I'm in gamble mode anyway. All I really need
> to do is just land one hit.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's a pretty good team strat actually.
> Your team gets and more damage from 1st to last. But you have to get
> closer to your opponent after each loss.
>
> Clark is a problem with meter. His range is an issue.
> Ryo has good range and uses some meter.
> EX Iori has great range and builds meter.
>
> On 30 Jun 2014 08:53, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yeah. On point.
>
>
>
> Ryo second, Clark anchor.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:45 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> you playing ex iori right?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:39:31 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You should have told me to play Clark ages ago. I've really been missing
> out *lol*
>
>
>
> If I get good results on Saturday, I'll keep using him :P
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:36 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> please sap don't go to the clarkside. stay in the light.
>
> @rich, erm ya thanks
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:34:23 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Btw, I've been working on those KOF combos LB. I've also added Clark to my
> team. He's actually not that difficult to use. I even have a 100% HD combo
> with him and legit throw setups after knockdown.
>
>
>
> My team order is going to be a little different now but I think I can make
> it work. I'll be free in Blaz but I'll definitely try my best not to be
> free in KOF *lol*
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> There's still KOF and BlazBlue LB :P
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> rank as it stands now:
>
>
> *Rank*
>
> *Participant Name*
>
> *Game/Set Wins*
>
> *Points Scored*
>
> 1
>
> Luminous
>
> 12
>
> 36
>
> 2
>
> SAPhoenix
>
> 11
>
> 35
>
> 3
>
> Sigma.g19
>
> 9
>
> 30
>
> 4
>
> Lindseyboi
>
> 7
>
> 27
>
> 5
>
> Zombiehunta
>
> 6
>
> 24
>
> 6
>
> O.M.A. Hei-Long
>
> 5
>
> 18
>
> 7
>
> Ennohex
>
> 4
>
> 17
>
> 8
>
> ANGRY MAD JIN
>
> 2
>
> 7
>
>
>
> ugh im number 4 , that's not good
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:21:39 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> If memory serves, the suggestion tabled by Lumi is that we subtract
> 'Points Given Up' from 'Points Scored' and add it to 'Game/Set Wins' for
> the final result. Lumi, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> ugh...
> my excel skills r gna be tested today. I shall do it
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:09:13 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I thought you guys just wanted to see what the current standings are at
> the sesh. I didn't know you wanted me to keep that spreadsheet!
>
>
>
> I didn't save it :(
>
>
>
> Sorry LB. You'll just have to do the math man. Either that or wait until
> we conclude the qualifiers for the final result.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> wtf man sap, wheres the excel with the current standings?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:59:40 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> *LOL*
>
>
>
> As requested:
>
>
>
> http://challonge.com/usf4qualifier
>
>
>
> http://challonge.com/umvc3qualifier
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:34 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Morning peeps,
>
> why am I lagging in d3?????????? this is fkd up , im so jealous of your
> dps right now paas, my hate for you is strong. half a million dps over 5
> million toughness, almost 8000 dex O_o.
>
> have you tried to do 100% evasion build? I believe its possible now since
> you can get over 8000 dex.
>
> @sap, can you link us to the overall standings for the 5v5 please. My
> predictions are that if we are 7 then I don't think Richard and manase is
> gna make it.
>
> so the final team, in points.
>
> me - all points
> gb - below me by a lot
> lumi - above sap
> sap - above zombie
> zombie - above richard.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:58:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> along with Lust of the Dead.
>
> The script there was just as riveting.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The plot for this movie sounds so crazy I just must get it
>
> A brilliant doctor on a quest for revenge buys a young woman and trains
> her to be the ultimate assassin, implanting gun parts in her body that she
> must later assemble and use to kill her target before she bleeds to death.
>
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3141912/
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wham
> ACDC
> Red hot Chilli Pepper.
>
> On 29 Jun 2014 21:49, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The reason it's like that it's because the Japanese have problems
> pronouncing V so often they write it as a B. As Manase said, Japan
> doesn't actually have words with a V, but since the introduction of Western
> terms into their vocabulary they were forced to create a symbol for it.
> Still, in most cases they prefer to use a B. When they know what the word
> means, they'll translate it correctly. For example, Forever is "foeba" in
> Japanese, but it's common enough for them to know it so translate it with a
> V. Interestingly enough, even in the original Japanese, they write
> Mohammad Abdul's name with a V (ヴ) so even when it's translated, it's
> still Avdol. Westerners know they mean Abdul though. The same thing
> happens with L and R. Japanese call Rolento "Lorento", presumably because
> they associate with the Italian name "Lorenzo". In Jojo's Anjuro is more
> commonly known as "Angelo". At the end of the day it just boils down to
> how familiar they are with the words and names.
>
> I've never realised how many of the Jojo's characters are named after
> music artists/songs.
>
> Vanilla Ice
>
> Steely Dan
>
> Kenny G
>
> Funny Valentine
>
> Telence T. Darby (should obviously be Terence)
>
> Iggy (Pop?)
>
> Enya [Gail]
>
> Foo Fighters
>
> Love the names in Jojos though. Whoever came up with the name "Weather
> Report" is a genius.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Avdol is how Japanese read and pronounce Abdul but not how the name is
> written.
>
> So what we see and here in games/anime is the mispronunciation of the name
> which is clearly wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not in Japan. lol
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's Abdul bro :)
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Just watched eps12 and 13 of Stardust Crusaders.
>
> I miss Avdul :(
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thank a lot man
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:54:17 +0200
>
> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> The Raid 2
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:51 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What movie is this from?? Looks cool
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:35:38 +0200
>
> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>
>
>
> ...this one
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> No, not that dude
>
> Lol
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/scale_small/1/12670/263141-shome_hr.jpg
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Watching The Raid 2.
> The baseball dude reminds me of Lumi.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
