[CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:14:31 +0200
You have to search on the day because they remove the streams as soon as
news about them reach Google.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:12 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> floyd and canello on saturday. anyone know where i can watch this online?
>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:10:13 +0200
>
> > Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List
> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > I know man, it interests me too - I just love saying " fucking nerds"
> >
> > On 13/09/2013, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > It's important research.
> > >
> > > If you go to a take away and have the option of choosing between a
> burger
> > > that's been standing on the tray for 10 minutes vs one that's only been
> > > there for 2 minutes, which one would you choose?
> > >
> > > I rest my case.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> > > <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > >
> > >> Shut up you nerds.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 13 September 2013 14:26, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I just realized the same idea behind garbage collection also applies
> to
> > >>> the cows. The only difference is that time scales are vastly
> different
> > >>> for
> > >>> computer processes and "real world" things.
> > >>>
> > >>> For example:
> > >>> There are 2 cows on a field, 1 has been laying down for 3 minutes, 1
> for
> > >>> an entire week. Which one is likely to stand up first? Cow number 1
> is
> > >>> almost certainly the correct answer.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> > >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The cow guys were interviewed about this and they were surprised at
> > >>>> the Ig. They said that their research actually has loads of
> applications
> > >>>> –
> > >>>> mainly to do with the health of cows and the amount of time between
> > >>>> naps
> > >>>> being one of the indicators of potential problems. They said that
> they
> > >>>> were
> > >>>> happy to get any publicity. Also they thought initially that the
> longer
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> cow had been lying down, the longer it would stand up afterwards and
> > >>>> were
> > >>>> surprised that the data didn’t reflect that.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don’t think they had the Garbage collection idea in mind
> though.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> > >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
> > >>>> *Sent:* 13 September 2013 2:14 PM
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> *Subject:* [CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *First, that the longer a cow has been lying down, the more likely
> that
> > >>>> cow will soon stand up;*****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is actually quite an interesting result. Interesting enough (to
> > >>>> me
> > >>>> at least) that it warrants further investigation, because in
> computing
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> opposite result is expected. In computing, there is a technique used
> > >>>> in
> > >>>> many modern programming languages called "Garbage collection". The
> idea
> > >>>> is
> > >>>> that you use whatever you want, and a process will automatically
> clean
> > >>>> up
> > >>>> for you at some indeterministic point. The thing is, some garbage
> > >>>> collectors work on the principle that the longer an object is in use
> > >>>> (ie.
> > >>>> doesn't need to be cleaned up), the longer it will remain in that
> state,
> > >>>> so
> > >>>> it will give them less priority. In other words, unless they have a
> > >>>> predetermined goal/destinations, an object who has been in state
> "A" for
> > >>>> a
> > >>>> long time will remain in that state longer than an object who has
> just
> > >>>> entered it.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I suppose with living things they do eventually eat and move around,
> > >>>> but
> > >>>> given certain parameters the basic principle should theoretically
> > >>>> remain
> > >>>> the same.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> > >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You mean libel – it’s in print.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don’t think you can get into trouble if what you report is the
> truth.
> > >>>> Those clauses exist in their contracts. They’re posted up on the
> MSSA
> > >>>> site.
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> They can get into trouble for calling MSSA dodgy or making specific
> > >>>> comments about Colin unless they have hard proof of it, not just
> > >>>> comments
> > >>>> from ‘reliable sources’.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Then again, that’s how it is supposed to work in a free country. I
> have
> > >>>> no idea what’s happening in South Africa and our freedom of
> information
> > >>>> act.
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> > >>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> > >>>> *Sent:* 13 September 2013 2:01 PM
> > >>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx****
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *Subject:* [CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hmm, so much for freedom of speech...****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I mean, is it really slander if there is evidence that MSSA is full
> of
> > >>>> shit?****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Wynand-Ben Viljoen <
> > >>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Its only getting better :P
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://www.lazygamer.net/south-africa/quick-mssa-updateround-5/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> MSSA seems to be taking legal action against Lazygamer.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is going to get colorfull
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:39:12 +0200****
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: New Mailing List****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx****
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Also, fuck the MSSA
> > >>>> > http://www.lazygamer.net/general-news/the-mssa-gags-its-players/
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> =========================================================================
> > >>>> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community
> mailing
> > >>>> list.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> > >>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> > >>>> communication in error, please address with the subject heading
> > >>>> "Received in error," send to the ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you
> are
> > >>>> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or any
> > >>>> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
> prohibited and
> > >>>> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> > >>>> subject to the****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> engagement
> > >>>> letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail
> and
> > >>>> any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the
> firm
> > >>>> are neither****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> given nor endorsed by it.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> > >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
> > >>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
> (“KPMG
> > >>>> International”) on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> > >>>> services to you. ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a
> network of
> > >>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
> > >>>> Cooperative (“KPMG International”)****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> provides no services to clients. ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Each member firm of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG
> > >>>> International”) is a legally distinct and separate entity and each
> > >>>> describes itself as such. Information about the structure and
> > >>>> jurisdiction of your local KPMG member ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
> by
> > >>>> AntiVirus software.****
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ** **
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > >>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> > >>>> e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> > >>>> communication in error, please address with the subject heading
> > >>>> "Received in error," send to the
> > >>>> sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you
> are
> > >>>> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or any
> > >>>> action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
> prohibited and
> > >>>> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> > >>>> subject to the
> > >>>> terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> engagement
> > >>>> letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail
> and
> > >>>> any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the
> firm
> > >>>> are neither
> > >>>> given nor endorsed by it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> > >>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
> > >>>> lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
> (“KPMG
> > >>>> International”) on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> > >>>> services to you.
> > >>>> KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a
> > >>>> Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a
> network of
> > >>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
> > >>>> Cooperative (“KPMG International”)
> > >>>> provides no services to clients.
> > >>>> Each member firm of KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG
> > >>>> International”) is a legally distinct and separate entity and each
> > >>>> describes itself as such. Information about the structure and
> > >>>> jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
> > >>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
> by
> > >>>> AntiVirus software.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting
> Game Community mailing list.
> >
> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
Other related posts:
