Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:34:39 -0800

Where does Khan live?
On Jan 26, 2015 5:31 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Awesome bro, thx :)
> On 26 Jan 2015 15:11, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Here's the Feb load shedding schedule:
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5D2zKrvOErRRGRZczZhcG94NEk/view
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>  Yeah, need to check my area as well. The problem is that Eskom said
>>> that they’re changing the schedule so as not to screw over specific areas.
>>> They haven’t released the new schedule for Western Cape.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 2:27 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to shed a load on them. Hmmm, l better start checking schedules
>>> and shit.
>>>
>>> On 26 Jan 2015 14:24, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Eskom just shed its load on us here at work
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:06:09 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Majesty.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 January 2015 at 12:40, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off
>>> the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people
>>> make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’
>>> thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of
>>> donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a
>>> particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
>>> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
>>> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of it
>>> :P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and
>>> chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent
>>> allowed to sell the videos at all.
>>>
>>> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use
>>> the games name in the video description...
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an
>>> article about Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their
>>> games and not allowing third parties to directly generate income from them.
>>> I think guys were saying that it may become illegal for tournament
>>> organizers to generate income by streaming or using their games to do so
>>> unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I don't
>>> see it happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around
>>> these sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is
>>> becoming pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown
>>> around so maybe?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why
>>> they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to
>>> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem
>>> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control
>>> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
>>> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>
>>>
>>> T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post
>>> some vids.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming
>>> gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I can relate.
>>>
>>> On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   I don't want to go to wurk.
>>>
>>> I want to escape with the kitties.
>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
>>> blokkie kaka quality??
>>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>>>
>>> I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because
>>> they limit the res.
>>>
>>> Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out
>>> how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of
>>> their footage looks like ass.
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sickest Potemkin ever
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Dude is entertaining to watch.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>>>
>>> this is too real , the future is now.
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Good morning.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until
>>> Sun 25th.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and
>>> the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>>>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>>>
>>> they couldve just made it together.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of
>>> Hell.
>>> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh
>>> my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross play
>>> the stuff on PS3.
>>> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've
>>> bought the same game 3 times.
>>> :/
>>> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat
>>> outta Hell.
>>> Decisions, decisions.
>>>
>>> On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  It will sell by the gazillions
>>>
>>> On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wonder how well this game will do.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Blame LB.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>  No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   tokido is the sickest
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>>>
>>> 18:20
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
>>> I still want to explore stuff.
>>> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
>>> Not yet anyways.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>
>>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015