Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:11:14 +0200

Here's the Feb load shedding schedule:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5D2zKrvOErRRGRZczZhcG94NEk/view

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Yeah, need to check my area as well. The problem is that Eskom said that
> they’re changing the schedule so as not to screw over specific areas. They
> haven’t released the new schedule for Western Cape.
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 2:27 PM
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> I'd like to shed a load on them. Hmmm, l better start checking schedules
> and shit.
>
> On 26 Jan 2015 14:24, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Eskom just shed its load on us here at work
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:06:09 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Majesty.
>
>
>
> On 26 January 2015 at 12:40, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off
> the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people
> make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’
> thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of
> donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>
>
>
> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>
>
>
> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>
>
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
>
>
>
> Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a
> particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of it
> :P
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and
> chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent
> allowed to sell the videos at all.
>
> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use
> the games name in the video description...
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an article about
> Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their games and not
> allowing third parties to directly generate income from them. I think guys
> were saying that it may become illegal for tournament organizers to
> generate income by streaming or using their games to do so unless they'd
> obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I don't see it
> happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around these
> sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is becoming
> pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown around so
> maybe?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why
> they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to
> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem
> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control
> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>
>
> T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post
> some vids.
>
>
>
> I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming
> gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I can relate.
>
> On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   I don't want to go to wurk.
>
> I want to escape with the kitties.
>
>
> ​
>
>
>
> On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
> blokkie kaka quality??
>
> On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>
>
>
> Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>
> I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because they
> limit the res.
>
> Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>
>
>
>
>
> While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out
> how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of
> their footage looks like ass.
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Sickest Potemkin ever
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   Dude is entertaining to watch.
>
>
>
> I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>  ------------------------------
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>
> this is too real , the future is now.
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Good morning.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>
>
>
> On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun
> 25th.
>
>
>
> GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and
> the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>
>
> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>
> they couldve just made it together.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>
> On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell.
> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh
> my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross play
> the stuff on PS3.
> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've bought
> the same game 3 times.
> :/
> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat
> outta Hell.
> Decisions, decisions.
>
> On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  It will sell by the gazillions
>
> On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>
>
>
> Wonder how well this game will do.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>
> On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   Blame LB.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>
> On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>   tokido is the sickest
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>
> 18:20
>  ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
> I still want to explore stuff.
> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
> Not yet anyways.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015