Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:08:54 +0200

Convenient, thx Salie.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Here's the Feb load shedding schedule:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5D2zKrvOErRRGRZczZhcG94NEk/view
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  Yeah, need to check my area as well. The problem is that Eskom said
>> that they’re changing the schedule so as not to screw over specific areas.
>> They haven’t released the new schedule for Western Cape.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 2:27 PM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd like to shed a load on them. Hmmm, l better start checking schedules
>> and shit.
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2015 14:24, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Eskom just shed its load on us here at work
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:06:09 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Majesty.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26 January 2015 at 12:40, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off
>> the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people
>> make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’
>> thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of
>> donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>>
>>
>>
>> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>>
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a
>> particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
>> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
>> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of it
>> :P
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and
>> chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent
>> allowed to sell the videos at all.
>>
>> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to use
>> the games name in the video description...
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an article about
>> Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their games and not
>> allowing third parties to directly generate income from them. I think guys
>> were saying that it may become illegal for tournament organizers to
>> generate income by streaming or using their games to do so unless they'd
>> obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I don't see it
>> happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around these
>> sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is becoming
>> pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown around so
>> maybe?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s why
>> they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to
>> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem
>> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control
>> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
>> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>> T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or post
>> some vids.
>>
>>
>>
>> I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and streaming
>> gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  I can relate.
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   I don't want to go to wurk.
>>
>> I want to escape with the kitties.
>>
>>
>> ​
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
>> blokkie kaka quality??
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>>
>> I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because they
>> limit the res.
>>
>> Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure out
>> how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of
>> their footage looks like ass.
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> Sickest Potemkin ever
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Dude is entertaining to watch.
>>
>>
>>
>> I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>>
>> this is too real , the future is now.
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Good morning.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>>
>>
>>
>> On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun
>> 25th.
>>
>>
>>
>> GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far and
>> the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>>
>>
>> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>>
>> they couldve just made it together.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell.
>> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but oh
>> my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross play
>> the stuff on PS3.
>> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've
>> bought the same game 3 times.
>> :/
>> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat
>> outta Hell.
>> Decisions, decisions.
>>
>> On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  It will sell by the gazillions
>>
>> On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>>
>>
>>
>> Wonder how well this game will do.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   Blame LB.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>   Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   tokido is the sickest
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>>
>> 18:20
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
>> I still want to explore stuff.
>> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
>> Not yet anyways.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015