OK if you say so Nick,, I like good movies,, if I like the shining then I download it On Jan 16, 2015 8:27 PM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > kids nowadays > > It's a good movie Rich... hee hee > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Os6raCCmAFk > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:13 PM, richard moorcroft < > greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The shining????? >> On Jan 16, 2015 8:08 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> hahahaha wp, very quick. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:05:32 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> In 'The Shining' >>> On 16 Jan 2015 8:02 PM, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Cassie cage?? Where's Johnny??? >>> On Jan 16, 2015 8:01 PM, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like Ermac to return... he should, considering he ran away in MK9. >>> Although I'll be using Ferra/Torr and Kotal Kahn as well as most of the >>> kast anyway... except for Cassie Cage, staying away from her. >>> >>> Sent from Samsung Mobile >>> >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir >>> Date:16/01/2015 19:41 (GMT+02:00) >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Don't have much hope for Shang Tsung, but I expect I'll get my sorcerer >>> nonsense on with Quan and Shinnok >>> On 16 Jan 2015 16:37, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Ermac... that is all. >>> On 16 Jan 2015 4:34 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Seeing that dead characters are returning out of no where left and >>> right...Nightwolf may return... >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Zombie Nightwolf! >>> >>> They need to bring him back :( >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:32:03 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>> MKX!!! That game is looking very good. Character design is more mature, >>> which is good. Less bikini and thongs for the ladies. Kitana's new look >>> actually is pretty well designed. >>> >>> Isn't T7 suppose to release around Feb-March? >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Drag and Leo are there. He’ll be fine. >>> >>> Anyways, this is all besides the point. In April MKX hits. That’s all >>> that really matters, you know? >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >>> *Sent:* 16 January 2015 4:26 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> >>> Ben is just mad because NONE of the characters he plays is in T7 at the >>> moment. :P >>> >>> They killed Lei and made 6 characters out of him. Hahaha >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Guilty Gear IS a good game >>> >>> Forget about Tekken >>> >>> :D >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 06:22:10 -0800 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> TEKKEN 7 might be a good game,, I hope >>> On Jan 16, 2015 4:08 PM, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> How wrong is rubbish I don't scare for him. >>> >>> On 16 January 2015 at 15:21, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Well they do take damage even if the Power Crush through your >>> moves...which is one thing that's making the Power Crush system fair. >>> However, if your opponent is at 90% hp while you're at 20%? they can just >>> spam Power Crush until it hits...Risk and Reward is unfair at that point :/ >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:19 PM, richard moorcroft < >>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Why is a power crush + frames??? That doesn't make sense,, it must at >>> least be -10 or more,, not safe that is bad_,, if they are safe it can be >>> abused alot >>> On Jan 16, 2015 2:59 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Nope. His pokes/flamingo mix up is nerfed to useless because Power >>> Crush just beats everything out of his FLA stance. He can do lows in FLA to >>> counter act Power Crush. But his lows in FLA is weak...also some Power >>> Crush is pretty fast...so it might beat his FLA lows anyways...that's why i >>> said Power Crush should all have the same frame or something...cos it's a >>> little unfair that some character have better Power Crush than >>> some...Lili's one launches and it's -12...Feng's is +frame on >>> block...Paul's too... >>> >>> His combo has always been high damage. But in Tekken...combo doesn't >>> mean everything...if you can't land your launchers...your high damage >>> combos just goes to waste... >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:55 PM, richard moorcroft < >>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> So they Nerf the guy,, but give him a combo that costs you your life >>> after he pokes the hell out of you?? I call that a super buffed up character >>> On Jan 16, 2015 2:47 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> He's kindda ridiculous in TTT2...d+3,4 being NC is nuts lolz 4,3/4,3~b >>> FLA mix up. Only issue of Hwoarang is WS punishment. But other than that, >>> he got a lot of tools during TTT2 that helps him a lot. Also i TTT2 health >>> bar in Tag mode is lower...so Hwoarang's combo and poke does ridiculously >>> high damage compare to other character...Because when i did 1v1 with >>> Vic...d+3,4 does shit damage like in BR. >>> >>> >>> But i think it's more in-direct nerf to him in T7: >>> >>> Removing Bound also removes his ability to combo off his FLA low trip. >>> u+3+4 now launches back turn... >>> >>> But his combo potential is still top notch in T7. The new tailspin >>> mechanic favors him. Saw a JFSR combo that is more than 70% of your >>> life...Nuts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> >>> >