https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLq28rIFY1Q Perfect example for combo damage scaling...Rage Arts did like 10dmg... On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Are you playing with the WoG mod? It's awesome (not the campaign, just > the game changes). AI is smarter, and you have access to loads more stuff. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Haha >> Hey you may have won 98% of all of our matches ever but I did once low >> parry 3 way option select your ff+2 into the low ! >> In T6 the timing on the d/f+2 punish option could be delayed slightly to >> low parry first or ss launch the 2 other ff+2 options. >> >> I forgot how long a campaign in HoMM3 could be so my sleep is >> experiencing some loadshedding at the moment. >> >> On 19 February 2015 at 18:27, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> He must be pretty lousy then because your tech is ass. >>> >>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Stephen Scheidel<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: 2015-02-19 18:06 >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Di here is some more T7. >>> Bappara is a OG Japanese Lee expert that I steal from. >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUFkGtFLoU >>> >>> On 19 February 2015 at 17:55, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >>> The MK series had a lot of boinking. >>> There was a tribe of boinking chicks that would steal "life essence" >>> from their partners. >>> Reptile boinked the most. He was immune to their "powers" Go figure. >>> >>> It didn't hurt that the girls in the story were good looking either. >>> That hollywood make-up magic. >>> Oh, and plastic surgery, natch. >>> >>> On 19 Feb 2015 17:12, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> lol >>> >>> That and Naruto/Bleach/One Piece seem to be the autopilot troll response >>> whenever people ask "What anime is that" in AMVs or other media etc. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:55:42 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Fucksakes I just googled that here at work. >>> smh :) >>> >>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:53, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> He could have said "Boku no Pico"... >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:49:39 +0200 >>> >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> I hate you. >>> >>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:47, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> >>> wrote: >>> I think it’s Naruto. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] >>> On Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 4:42 PM >>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> >>> Dawie's origimal name is David. >>> >>> Does anyone remember that cartoon with the green mice in the theater ? >>> May have been french. >>> Can't think of the name and google aint helping. >>> >>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:22, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> >>> wrote: >>> Me neither. >>> Didn’t understand enough Afrikaans. Same with Brakenjan. Watched some >>> stuff that was simulcast. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] >>> On Behalf Of richard moorcroft >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 4:21 PM >>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Really?? I never watched the show >>> On Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> Dawie doesnt die. He turns into an oaktree. >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:03 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Firstly I would like to thank you guys for using the correct move name >>> for raisins. >>> Secondly I have to say that I SS hopkick delayed raisins like a fucking >>> champion. >>> >>> :) >>> >>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> "Ek is Daaaaawie, die KABBBBOUUUTTTER!!" Damn, the feels *lmao* >>> On 19 Feb 2015 15:24, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> Oh shit! I didn't realise Dawie die Kabouter dies in the end. >>> >>> Come on, sing along everyone! >>> >>> DAWIE DIE KABOUTER AFRIKAANS INTRO LIED< >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iymgR6fbzDI> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> Paul has great punishment. >>> >>> Im sure something will hit. >>> >>> >>> You guys created your own Lei myth about his stances not being >>> punishable lol. >>> ________________________________ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> > >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:01:25 +0000 >>> >>> Are these all the cases where you’re badly negative, but totally >>> unpunishable? >>> >>> Sorry, but I still don’t care that you don’t get continuous rush down. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 2:54 PM >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Its great but that also kinda points out the problem. >>> >>> To get into Tiger(4th razor hit) you need razor CH or do delay >>> shenanigans. Would have been nice to be on enough plus to force the >>> opponent to block the incoming mixup instead getting to bait retaliation. >>> >>> Tiger is not really a problem tho since its the most usefull stance >>> imo. It actually has answers for whatever the opponent does. >>> Snake can mostly handle itself as well. >>> >>> Panther and Dragon needs some help on their transitions. >>> >>> >>> This is all talking about transitions on HIT. >>> >>> On blocked razor into Tiger lei is at -14. >>> Other stance transitions from razor on block are all worse than -10 on >>> block as well. >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:38:57 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> I saw a few Lei player then to go into Tiger after razor rush on hit and >>> then hold back so you dash out of their range of their dick punch or their >>> retaliation. That's where TGR 4 launches them. It's a weird set up but it >>> works for those who are bad under pressure of razor rush and just think >>> dick punch solves everything. >>> Not sure if it'll work the same on block though. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> On block I dont mind. >>> >>> They just need to buff the frames on hit. >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:13:03 +0200 >>> >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> I know they nerfed his razor rush a few times. >>> It use to razor rush on block into stance and guess. >>> Now razor rush on block into stance...dick punch/generic d+4 stops all. >>> Lei's turn to guess...Unless his stances have hopkick...razor rush is not >>> as strong as it used to be in old times. Also the razor rush sidestep into >>> stances used to cover much more distance. I remember i could almost go into >>> opponent's back if they do something linear or dick punch. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> >>> wrote: >>> It wasn’t just his combo damage was it? >>> I might be wrong, but didn’t they buff his damage for other moves? I’m >>> thinking very specifically of raisin rush on CH. >>> >>> I think you just need to get off your lazy ass and learn how to do Lei’s >>> punishment game properly. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 2:04 PM >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> The problem is once he loses his damage(Im fairly sure hes not going to >>> keep it) he going to be below average again unless his actual moves are >>> improved. >>> >>> Trackings/Frames or otherwise >>> ________________________________ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> > >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:52:15 +0000 >>> Paul’s d+1 doesn’t track all that well. Generally you are forced to use >>> it because it’s his only fast-ish mid. He doesn’t have a generic df+1. You >>> have df+2 at 15f, but that’s punishable. >>> Meh, as Steve said, we’ve had these discussions before and they go round >>> and round. Paul doesn’t need better tracking. He’s got his good punishment, >>> nice wall game and good mid range moves. What he lacks is tracking or any >>> sort of plus on block/ rush down game. If they give those to him, well then >>> he jumps a bit in the tier list. Would I like those added? Sure. Is it a >>> major issue not having them? Not really. >>> >>> Lei doesn’t need trackers. He has enough other tools. Are they good >>> enough to make him top tier? Hell no. Is he still playable? Sure. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Di Lhong >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 1:44 PM >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Paul's d+1 tracks really well. He also have a generic db+4. >>> Sure it's not as damaging as some homing move. But they're pokes that is >>> fast and stops your opponent from walking around freely. And on hit, it >>> puts you back to "your" game. Instead of defending and waiting to land a >>> b+2 homing. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH? >>> >>> I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he >>> is forced to taunt. >>> ________________________________ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> > >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000 >>> >>> Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under 25f >>> as well. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 1:33 PM >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Or make 1+2 track. >>> >>> Its high so can be ducked and stuff >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD >>> If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the >>> fact it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... >>> If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too >>> fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel < >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. >>> Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. >>> >>> >>> On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. >>> >>> He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. >>> >>> Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its >>> only to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is >>> going to step. >>> >>> Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is >>> the only reason hes considered High in TTT2. >>> >>> Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side >>> or something. >>> Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. >>> >>> ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we >>> always bitch about him. >>> >>> On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> >>> wrote: >>> Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. >>> >>> I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t >>> enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the >>> other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment >>> and average pokes. >>> >>> Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d >>> put him happily mid – probably below Paul though. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 11:38 AM >>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> >>> lol >>> >>> They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to >>> compete. >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Remove ff+3. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove >>> the shenanigans hes a below average character. >>> >>> So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger >>> tools to play a more normal game. >>> >>> >>> He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core >>> problems with his moves sadly. >>> ________________________________ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> > >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 >>> >>> Lei needs buffs? LOL! >>> Good one Paas. I need that. >>> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben >>> Sent: 19 February 2015 11:12 AM >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would >>> have to buff the rest of his stuff. >>> >>> Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some >>> that are just straight up bad. >>> ________________________________ >>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update >>> them properly. >>> Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and >>> useful. >>> I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe >>> the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of >>> Tekken. >>> Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't >>> knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks >>> punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> >>> ********************************************************************** >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member >>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. >>> >>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >>> >> >> >