Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: richard moorcroft <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:45:18 -0800

Noob character Katarina????
On Feb 19, 2015 10:42 AM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Shaheen is pretty popular. He has solid moves.
>
> Went through the movelist for new characters. Does seem like they're
> making things easier. Like in SC5 where they removed a lot of the moves.
> Only Lucky Chloe has stances and a more in-depth command list (but nothing
> compare to zafina, lei, capos, baek, hwoarang, etc). Katarina's command
> list is hilarious (333333 444444 uf4444444)
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  Meh, dunno Steve’s moves well enough to know what that is.
>>
>>
>>
>> Played more Manic Miner. Still going nowhere. Also Dangerous Dave a bit,
>> and a few others like it. Got stuck in Zork with one of those stupid
>> questions that they have for copy protection – stuff you need to read in
>> the manual. I’ll need to track down a walkthrough or something with those
>> in it. I remember a fair bit of the beginning of the game and some random
>> points in it. Fun to be replaying. Doesn’t go to full screen well though.
>>
>>
>>
>> Watching some of Shaheed’s moves. Took me a second to realise it was him.
>> Thought it was Lars with a new customisation. Get the same feeling with the
>> Quincy guy.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 7:25 AM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> qcf+1 was fast and should wallsplat.
>>
>> also filler combo into alb+2 used to wallsplat for lekker wall dmg
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:19:47 +0000
>>
>> Hmmm. I ate a whole load of the cyc d+2s, but usually when I was already
>> knd.
>>
>>
>>
>> Does Steve have anything fast now that wallsplats?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 7:17 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> That d2 was too strong ,, so the Nerf was good
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2015 11:08 PM, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Poor Steve, sonic fang doesn't wallsplat and cyclone d+2 doesn't
>> knockdown anymore...
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxTXxHxtak8
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Tiger assist!
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:42:31 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XAle3MQzLA
>>
>>
>>
>> Kazumi looks nice.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Never knew this was an actual song. Just thought it was something the
>> GMSA dudes came up with.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-62nEc4TgZ8
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I was there that day smoking enchies in the tunnel.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 February 2015 at 19:43, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  1998 best year
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:22:49 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> Noooooit bro.  This song was lank kiff back in the day.
>>
>> I laaak it almost as much as this number.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed_7krCFgEs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  This is far beyond my abilities.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18 February 2015 at 19:06, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Who else remembers this?
>>
>> http://bit.ly/1CIEIJS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>   ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015