Graphics is looking much better than the first few location test. Lighting looks good. Not full release yet. Full release is expected on March. So not to far off. Gameplay: http://i.pomf.se/aqekub.mp4 Slow Mo Demo (it's cool but it should only occur during KO...otherwise, it will screw up gaming pace and momentum if it didn't KO): http://i.pomf.se/qjahgy.mp4 Camera function (Now Mishima players can go 100% vs each other): http://i.pomf.se/wkrwia.mp4 On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well I have about 50 days of leave, so I wanna take that first. If I > leave now they're going to have to pay me out, which they won't. So I'm > probably going on holiday soon again. But we're also booking flights to > the states next month, so I need to take that into consideration as well. > If I do start a new job, they'll need to give me off 3 weeks in August. > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Sounds bleak. >> >> I recall you mentioning that you might start looking for another job due >> to changes in work hours. Is this the final nail in the coffin or are you >> gonna stick around and see what happens? >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> It's all up in the air at the moment. A lot of people were basing their >>> decision on whether they were gonna stay or go on his appointment. Now >>> that someone else is taking over, the atmosphere is really depressing. >>> Seems like many people are just about ready to throw in the towel. >>> >>> Basically, the reason for his non-appointment was that one of the other >>> candidates has more practical experience in a particular field. This tells >>> us the direction the company wants to move toward, and it's not a direction >>> we want to go. >>> >>> Currently I'm still not affected, but I'm not enthusiastic about any of >>> this. My worst years at this company was working with the people that I'm >>> going to be forced to work soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> *lol* No worries, I got ya. >>>> >>>> So what does that mean for you guys, now that your boss has lost his >>>> job? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Bleh. Too many brainfarts. >>>>> >>>>> "we tend to think procedurally, not functionally" is what I meant to >>>>> say. >>>>> >>>>> It's been a long day. Just found out our boss lost his job :-\ >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Programming is all about giving good instructions. If you can give >>>>>> good instructions, you can be a good programmer. >>>>>> >>>>>> The hard part is functional programming because we don't tend to >>>>>> procedurally, not functionally. And asynchronous programming can be >>>>>> tricky, even though in the real world it's a breeze to handle and >>>>>> understand because we do everything asynchronously. >>>>>> >>>>>> The cool thing about Javascript is that you can use it to learn >>>>>> functional and procedural techniques. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well I'm enjoying it so far. I suppose that's the important thing. >>>>>>> Troubleshooting = problem solving = I have a knack. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hate maths though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You need a knack for problem solving. It can be a lot of fun. >>>>>>>> From time to time I will review models and try to track down issues – >>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>> be lousy macros, poor maths or just bad model governance. That’s more >>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>> style than straight programming. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good luck with it all. I suppose just keep at it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams >>>>>>>> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 3:16 PM >>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've always felt that I don't have a mind for programming, so I'm >>>>>>>> trying to see if I'm wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did a couple of years of comp sci at varsity. Quit when I realised >>>>>>>> it was nothing like gaming. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> From: Ryan Williams<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Sent: 2015-02-17 14:54 >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to >>>>>>>> grasp. Shit gets real after that. Currently learning functions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or >>>>>>>> something. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> kuk is hard. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yar. Learning Javascript. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> code academy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> End of the month. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> So no Kamimodo this week? >>>>>>>> :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams < >>>>>>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm learning how to code. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> 1...2....3....4.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tumbooroo weedo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @paas >>>>>>>> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 >>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>> Bummer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I-no's looks the best tho. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine >>>>>>>> today. >>>>>>>> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel < >>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> [cid:ii_i692juxm0_14b96cde4c77c2f7] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets < >>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Are you really happy with a win.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> YES >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it >>>>>>>> to you, not your skill? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets >>>>>>>> Sent: 17 February 2015 10:50 AM >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> winnings winning >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [cid:image001.png@01D04AA0.930D4E90] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. >>>>>>>> You'll know what real bopping is on Saturday. >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> wtf!!!!!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sap didn't I bop you last nyt? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> *lol* >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>>>>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that >>>>>>>> in melty... :-? >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> I didn't know you were expecting LB. Congrats. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets < >>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> u violet my expectancy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> now im mad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> let the bopping commence >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He's not unsure, he's in denial. >>>>>>>> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>>>>>>> ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > im unsure whats happening. >>>>>>>> LB's epitaph >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets < >>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> they probably related to "the answer" somehow. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> im unsure whats happening. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200 >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>>>>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since >>>>>>>> they've obtained source code to hardware firmware. These hacks go way >>>>>>>> back >>>>>>>> to 2001. Noone knows what they're capable of now. And you still have >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel < >>>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Can dey hek my iped? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and >>>>>>>> spy programs: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf >>>>>>>> tl;dr: The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" >>>>>>>> that, among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC >>>>>>>> hard drive firmware and can operate undetected. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >>>>>>>> e-mail >>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this >>>>>>>> communication in >>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >>>>>>>> send to >>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on >>>>>>>> it, >>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the >>>>>>>> governing >>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other >>>>>>>> information >>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, >>>>>>>> lost, >>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative >>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm >>>>>>>> providing >>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") >>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International >>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >>>>>>>> International is >>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as >>>>>>>> such. >>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG >>>>>>>> member >>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept >>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ********************************************************************** >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >>>>>>>> e-mail >>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this >>>>>>>> communication in >>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >>>>>>>> send to >>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on >>>>>>>> it, >>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the >>>>>>>> governing >>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other >>>>>>>> information >>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, >>>>>>>> lost, >>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative >>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm >>>>>>>> providing >>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>>>>> International") is >>>>>>>> a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International >>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >>>>>>>> International is >>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as >>>>>>>> such. >>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG >>>>>>>> member >>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept >>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >>>>>>>> e-mail >>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this >>>>>>>> communication in >>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," >>>>>>>> send to >>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on >>>>>>>> it, >>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the >>>>>>>> governing >>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other >>>>>>>> information >>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, >>>>>>>> lost, >>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative >>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm >>>>>>>> providing >>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") >>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International >>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >>>>>>>> International is >>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as >>>>>>>> such. >>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG >>>>>>>> member >>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept >>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >