Eh i hate functions... On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In my experience, the first few lessons were simple enough to grasp. Shit > gets real after that. Currently learning functions. > On 17 Feb 2015 14:51, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> f I stopped somewhere at the beginning , writing my name or something. >> >> kuk is hard. >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:49:54 +0200 >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Yar. Learning Javascript. >> On 17 Feb 2015 14:49, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> code academy? >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:48:18 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> End of the month. >> On 17 Feb 2015 14:47, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> So no Kamimodo this week? >> :( >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> I'm learning how to code. >> On 17 Feb 2015 14:45, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> 1...2....3....4.... >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:43:44 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Tumbooroo weedo >> >> On 17 February 2015 at 13:07, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> :( >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:01:32 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> @paas >> I see you cannot use the PSN+ Guilty Gear colours on the ps3 version. >> Bummer. >> >> I-no's looks the best tho. >> On 17 Feb 2015 11:14, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Egh i stuck running meters and meters of vinyl through a machine today. >> Pretty boring but at least I'm near a pc most of the time. >> >> On 17 February 2015 at 11:10, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 17 February 2015 at 11:00, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Are you really happy with a win.... >> >> *YES* >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:58:03 +0000 >> >> >> Are you really happy with a win where it was the lag that gave it to >> you, not your skill? >> >> Yawn. Having trouble staying awake here. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets >> *Sent:* 17 February 2015 10:50 AM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> winnings winning >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:42:48 +0200 >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *lol* You mean like me winning all those matches last night? :P >> On 17 Feb 2015 10:39, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:33:07 +0200 >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> You call winning once with 16f delay bopping? The fark outta here. You'll >> know what real bopping is on Saturday. >> On 17 Feb 2015 10:30, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> wtf!!!!!!! >> >> sap didn't I bop you last nyt? >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:29:35 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *lol* >> On 17 Feb 2015 10:26, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Is it GB's? I knew something was up, letting him bop you like that in >> melty... :-? >> On 17 Feb 2015 10:21 AM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I didn't know you were expecting LB. Congrats. >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> u violet my expectancy >> >> now im mad >> >> let the bopping commence >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:56:31 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> He's not unsure, he's in denial. >> On 17 Feb 2015 09:55, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > im unsure whats happening. >> LB's epitaph >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:50 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> they probably related to "the answer" somehow. >> >> also I would like closure on the topic of jeeva or kami this week? >> >> im unsure whats happening. >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:31:07 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> You have to assume that they can hack basically anything since they've >> obtained source code to hardware firmware. These hacks go way back to >> 2001. Noone knows what they're capable of now. And you still have to >> consider the capabilities of Russia, China, Europe and Israel. >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Stephen Scheidel < >> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Can dey hek my iped? >> >> >> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Interesting material for people who like reading about hacking and spy >> programs: >> >> >> https://securelist.com/files/2015/02/Equation_group_questions_and_answers.pdf >> tl;dr: The NSA has an elite hacking group nicknamed "Equation" that, >> among other things, has managed to create spyware that infects PC hard >> drive firmware and can operate undetected. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >> >> >>