RE: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:20:29 +0000

For some reason they havent done loadshedding our flat at all last week.

We got it at work and other places but for none at the flat.  Checked the 
schedule and sat there waiting for it to go out...   never happens

Not complaining tho

From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:01:55 +0000









Dunno about the troll2 idea for Evo weekend. That sounds full of fail. Why 
don’t we just stick to some old school Chinese kung-fu
 movies?
 
The load shedding has been a bit insane here. We lost power in the centre of 
Jo’burg from 09h30 until 15h30 on Friday. Um… Isn’t
 this the financial capital of the country? Couldn’t they load shed somewhere 
else like Bloemfontein? I’m sure nothing important ever happens there.
 
 
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir

Sent: 09 February 2015 12:39 PM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
 
Yup, loadsharing f'd up the appointments.

Really wanted to own peeps that day too...

Well, that's not true.

I just wanted to bash I-no repeatedly.  Hehe.


On 9 Feb 2015 11:56, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yeah, not really *lol*

In all honesty though, figured you were at work :)


On 9 Feb 2015 10:56, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Odd, Potempkin didn't feel missed.


On 8 Feb 2015 22:29, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVAka_y3BC0


 

On 8 February 2015 at 20:39, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Very interesting, air D is an air to air with great range so it's hard to 
punish since you use it from far.  I'm surprised with pineberry grenade being 
slower than gun flame though.





On 8 Feb 2015 11:58, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Manase checked out the frame data.

 


Berry takes 19 frames to load then 10 frames to throw.  Much slower than 
gunflame when used in neutral.


 


 


Also her jump dust gunshot gives her 5 frames of recovery when she lands 
apparently.  When it wiffs im wide open, cant block or airdash on my way down 
either.




Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:20:03 +0200

Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail

From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I nominate you for best troll :P


On 8 Feb 2015 08:34, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag/troll-2-and-best-worst-movie/



i nominate troll2 for evo weekend




Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 22:54:01 +0200

Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail

From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Man Brazil is good at producing legit dudes.

Funny name too :/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu3I6qJp1Mg



 

On 7 February 2015 at 22:21, Brian ... <dmfu360@xxxxxxxx> wrote:




Oh nice! Suppose this is as close to Jade as we get. These MKX updates they 
keep releasing are such torture though.




 


Sent from Windows Mail


 




From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir

Sent: ‎Saturday‎, ‎07‎ ‎February‎ ‎2015 ‎08‎:‎26‎ ‎AM

To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



 


So far, the video of MKX tells us that we may see Brutalities (Yes!) And that 
Jax may still be in the game as well.  His portrait is on one of the towers.

Ign also noted that Kitana has a fighting Variation called "mournful" where she 
uses Jade's staff.

On 7 Feb 2015 08:07, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yah, tekken needs a stick fighter.  He needs to wear a bandanna.


On 7 Feb 2015 03:17, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Judge Judo. 































...




The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please 
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and 
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, 
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do 
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed 
by it.



KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive 
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 



This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG 
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to 
you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity 
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms 
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to 
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and 
separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about the 
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from 
your KPMG representative.



This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by 
AntiVirus software.
                                          

Other related posts: