Odd, Potempkin didn't feel missed. On 8 Feb 2015 22:29, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVAka_y3BC0 > > On 8 February 2015 at 20:39, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Very interesting, air D is an air to air with great range so it's hard to >> punish since you use it from far. I'm surprised with pineberry grenade >> being slower than gun flame though. >> On 8 Feb 2015 11:58, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Manase checked out the frame data. >>> >>> Berry takes 19 frames to load then 10 frames to throw. Much slower than >>> gunflame when used in neutral. >>> >>> >>> Also her jump dust gunshot gives her 5 frames of recovery when she lands >>> apparently. When it wiffs im wide open, cant block or airdash on my way >>> down either. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 11:20:03 +0200 >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> I nominate you for best troll :P >>> On 8 Feb 2015 08:34, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag/troll-2-and-best-worst-movie/ >>> >>> i nominate troll2 for evo weekend >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 22:54:01 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Man Brazil is good at producing legit dudes. >>> Funny name too :/ >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu3I6qJp1Mg >>> >>> On 7 February 2015 at 22:21, Brian ... <dmfu360@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Oh nice! Suppose this is as close to Jade as we get. These MKX updates >>> they keep releasing are such torture though. >>> >>> Sent from Windows Mail >>> >>> *From:* Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, 07 February 2015 08:26 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> So far, the video of MKX tells us that we may see Brutalities (Yes!) And >>> that Jax may still be in the game as well. His portrait is on one of the >>> towers. >>> Ign also noted that Kitana has a fighting Variation called "mournful" >>> where she uses Jade's staff. >>> >>> On 7 Feb 2015 08:07, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yah, tekken needs a stick fighter. He needs to wear a bandanna. >>> On 7 Feb 2015 03:17, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Judge Judo. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Judo Chop! >>> [image: >>> http://brilliantfantastic.com/assets/judo-full-348fa5ee4484c3d8a7f26e439eb9d722.png] >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Ashraf Barendse < >>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> They need to put in a proper Judoka. Someone like Goh from VF. >>> And make her South African. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:54 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> lol, I just noticed that SAGamer forum has a loadshedding indicator at >>> the top of the page. That's a pretty nifty feed (if a bit sad). >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> That and persona. >>> On 6 Feb 2015 18:32, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> yatagarasu? >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:10:40 +0200 >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Who plays that game LB? >>> On 6 Feb 2015 18:00, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Tekken is racist. Hello der, its ur friendly neighborhood anime >>> salesman. Today we hav a special on persona ultimax suplex hold for R400. >>> Anyone? Whens yatagarsu? >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:59:50 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>> https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/s480x480/10959739_771433716288136_1558838750655320253_n.jpg?oh=6abb6d87adef73670cccd081eb483608&oe=55493461&__gda__=1432108113_7a139f8f2bdf142d0c0c9a97e46b69de >>> >>> Brutality confirmed? >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I dont think they are all that different in the movies (Except of course >>> for the last one that completely went its own course). >>> They are the same but most of their inner or subtle emotions are shown >>> to the audience through behavior instead hinted at or through internal >>> monologues and whatnot. >>> >>> And for the trope I also came up with mostly robot/synthetic girls... >>> but most of them had personality where rather "eccentric" when they >>> occasionally not chilled. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:15:48 +0000 >>> >>> The movies are a different beast all together. Most of the characters >>> a changed in that one. It’s not like Asuka from the series is the same as >>> the movies either. >>> >>> Hmmm. Okay, I’d forgotten about Rei ignoring Gendo’s orders – or when >>> she gets infected. Yeah, by then she has developed an independent >>> personality. >>> >>> Mostly the trope seems to be for the robot/synthetic girl thing. Now >>> that I think about it, I’m also having trouble remembering clear examples. >>> That’s also because I can’t remember details from a lot of shows. >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >>> *Sent:* 06 February 2015 3:42 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Cant remember all details clearly lol... used know my eva stuff by >>> heart some years ago. >>> You could probably describe Rei as emotionless, unhappy/depressed with >>> low self worth(Sees herself as a replaceable tool). >>> >>> For the show she essentially "likes" not feeling miserable :P >>> Due her low self worth midset the interaction with other humans is >>> important to her. Also why her early "responses" are related to Gendo >>> and/or his glasses. >>> Early on its only Gendo but that changes after the Shinji joins and >>> later Asuka etc. >>> >>> The lack of her acting out in normal circumstances makes the few times >>> she does more important. Smiling/Laughing when talking to Gendo, Hitting >>> shinji, her self sacrifice near the end and defying Gendo. (Im sure there >>> are more but I havent watched the original in ages). >>> >>> In the beginning it looks like she would simply just follow her order >>> because they are orders later on she makes her decisions herself. >>> >>> All of this is much less subtle and clear in the first 2 Rebuild movies. >>> >>> Cant remember the Alisa stuff clearly :/ >>> >>> Regarding the "trope" in general. I thought that I was familiar with >>> the trope but now Im struggling to think of characters who can be described >>> by it. >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:35:03 +0000 >>> Hmmm. Not sure if we’ll agree on Rei. What exactly do you recall about >>> her personality? Did she have any likes or dislikes? Did she have any real >>> reason for doing anything, I mean other than because Gendo asked her? I >>> suppose you could consider being subservient a personality type. What >>> exactly were her defining characteristics – and I don’t mean physical. >>> >>> Does Alisa wake up with a personality? I don’t remember the storyline >>> well enough, so I could easily be wrong, but I don’t recall her being >>> anything but a blank slate when she woke up. I don’t mean that she lacked >>> all information, just that she didn’t have any personality. >>> >>> I might be willing to grant you the Rei thing – there are some points in >>> the series where she does seem to be getting a personality. I’d say that >>> the wipes/resets of her are part of the reason she qualifies though. While >>> the others may start out with no personality, Rei is continually >>> reset/reborn. >>> >>> What links them for me is mainly the nature in which they acquire >>> personality – through almost exclusive interaction with a single male on >>> whom they form an attachment. Anyways, while examples may differ, you’ll >>> grant this is not a trope with which you are unfamiliar, right? >>> >>> For me the idea behind the character is lousy. >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >>> *Sent:* 06 February 2015 12:54 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Cant agree with that. >>> >>> Rei's lack of showing emotion is not the same as lacking >>> personality/soul. I dont think her personality changes much during the >>> show, it just becomes apparent later once she actually gets to interacts >>> with people besides Gendo. >>> Her motivations change and they start changing fairly early(before ep 8) >>> in the show... it doesnt help that she essentially gets >>> killed/replaced/reset during the show :P >>> >>> But what she does makes perfect sense considering her personality and >>> circumstances. >>> >>> Her personality is a bit more pronounced in the new movies. >>> >>> >>> I dunno about alisa. From what I can remember of the game >>> storie/cutscenes and movie she seems to have personality just fine and her >>> own motivations. Her essentially getting "mind controlled" for certain >>> periods of time doesnt detract from what she otherwise does willingly. >>> >>> >>> They are both independent characters imo >>> >>> >>> >>> Only blank slate here is Chi. Its how she was written and she >>> essentially starts out as a empty canvas. >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:48:25 +0000 >>> Rei is a clone created with no soul and no personality. She may be >>> flesh and blood, but there is no difference between her and a robot. >>> All of them have personalities in the end, but they don’t start with >>> them. >>> Also, by the end of Eva, Rei’s hopes and dreams all that junk still >>> don’t amount to more than what’s been given to her (i.e. Gendo’s plan or >>> Shinji’s decision). Chi is purely a product of Hideki. Alisa is just doing >>> what Lars wants, until she gets the Jin wipe. >>> None of them exist as independent characters. Sometimes characters in >>> the stories will assume human motivations or such things, but usually >>> they’re just lying to themselves. >>> >>> Alisa is a different story in her endings – I mean she seems to be >>> attending school and actually not just sitting in Lars’ broom closet >>> waiting for him to get home. >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >>> *Sent:* 06 February 2015 11:40 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Eh... >>> >>> I dont really see the connections that binds those 3. >>> >>> Rei & Chi the "emotionless" aspect. >>> Chi & Alisa are both "young" naive robots. >>> I think Rei and Alisa have got personalities tho but not really Chi. >>> >>> Only one of the chars who really fits the trope I think you are >>> describing would be Chi imo >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:12:44 +0000 >>> Ugh. I have a dislike for the trope. She’s the same as Rei in Eva, or >>> Chi in Chobits. Female characters with no personality. I understand why >>> they’re popular – they can in no way ever be threatening or take any >>> decisions which will negatively impact the people in their lives. They can >>> have no personality flaws because all they will ever have learned comes >>> from the (usually pathetic) main character on whom they are dependent. It’s >>> a pretty insulting phenomenon. >>> Effectively they’re blow-up dolls who can also clean the house and do >>> laundry. Character design? What a joke. >>> >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Di Lhong >>> *Sent:* 06 February 2015 10:58 AM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Alisa is still there -_-" >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> As cheerful as I am to see Paul and King there, what happened to Nina? >>> Or for that matter, Lei, the Capos, Bob, Changs, Zafina… Happy that Kuma, >>> the ‘roos and Alisa are gone. Not sure I like that they’ve been replaced by >>> a Quincy and neko-chan. >>> >>> Hopefully some more of the mainstays make it back. I can’t believe that >>> they’ll release a Tekken without Nina or Yoshi. They’ve made every previous >>> incarnation. >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Manase Zote >>> *Sent:* 05 February 2015 7:43 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> 13 days? >>> Not possible. Lol >>> On 5 Feb 2015 19:29, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> 13 days and counting...Namco better get their shit together. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Same here. >>> >>> The game itself looks good imo. >>> >>> But that doest help me till they add my characters. >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:33:32 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Characters aside I like the look of T7 :) >>> >>> On 5 February 2015 at 18:08, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'll rather wait until TxSF is released. Even though they haven't >>> released any game play footage, l doubt it'll be as bad as T7. >>> On 5 Feb 2015 18:03, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I just noticed how stupid Bryan looks in his picture. >>> How does the Tekken team always let these goofy ass smiles find their >>> way into the game. >>> >>> On 5 February 2015 at 18:00, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Lee is the most important character in Tekken and I deserve everything >>> I want. >>> Fuck Tekken right now. >>> >>> On 5 February 2015 at 17:28, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Luckily I like multiple GG characters... including a new addition. >>> >>> >>> Tekkens new additions suck ass. >>> And none of my interested characters are there... Yoshi or Jack would >>> have been acceptable if Lei was absent. >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:13:50 +0000 >>> Well GG released without your main as well. >>> >>> …although he may still be released and I don’t know about Tekken adding >>> lots more characters to come… >>> Maybe they’re keeping Lei as a surprise… >>> >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >>> *Sent:* 05 February 2015 3:40 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> Official Tekken 7 Website is online >>> >>> With a character list... >>> >>> http://www.tekken-official.jp/tk7ac/character/ >>> >>> Currently giving zero fucks about this game >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:50:30 -0800 >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Serious?? Sounds cool >>> On Feb 5, 2015 1:29 PM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> You can test it with multiple displays and high speed camera. >>> >>> Ive seen dedicated hardware that tests lag as well. Little box with >>> senson and hdmi cable. >>> >>> Plug into TV. >>> Point at the screen. >>> Presson button. >>> And it measures the lag. >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:26:48 -0800 >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Hardware like??? >>> On Feb 5, 2015 1:20 PM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Cant just use software program to test input lag. >>> >>> You need the correct hardware to do proper tests. >>> >>> >>> Other than that you just have to "feel it out" >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:15:36 -0800 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> You have confused me with a really difficult question,, I guess I use >>> TEKKEN and SF,, its really good compared to the last screen I had to play >>> on,, it was a HD TV with about 4 - 5 frames of lag, horrible >>> On Feb 5, 2015 1:13 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Which one do you play and do combos on Rich, the program/app for >>> testing lag or fighting games? >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:02 PM, richard moorcroft < >>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Isn't there a program that you can use to test input lag?? There should >>> be something like this >>> On Feb 5, 2015 12:53 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Links(just frames), juggles, rekka type moves, movement are all vital >>> when testing lag :) >>> Good choices there SAP. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Tekken, Mahvel, SF and VF >>> On 5 Feb 2015 12:28, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Out of interest, which games did you use for testing, Sap? >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Manase Zote >>> *Sent:* 05 February 2015 12:27 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> This is the best method, old school but it works. lol >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Or get a Hisense. Haven't experienced any lag issues with mine. Tested >>> it in - store with several games. >>> On 5 Feb 2015 12:15, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Really good monitors are stupidly expensive. Find some nice HD tv that >>> doesn’t have too much random extra processing going on – like the old >>> Bravias. Get one of those and live with the 1-2f lag. It doesn’t kill the >>> game or anything. You’ve played on my TV. While it does have a couple >>> frames lag more than Paas’ screen, it’s not a problem and you adjust very >>> quickly. >>> >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >>> *Sent:* 05 February 2015 12:13 PM >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> >>> The price is a bit harsh... >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Meh... at this price you're better off importing a known lag-free >>> monitor. >>> >>> http://www.uprice.co.za/p/AOC-G2460PQU-24-inch-Gaming-Monitor/41408280/ >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The AOC's do lag. From 1f to 5f depending on the model. The non-3D >>> version is better value for money. >>> If you want to go with AOC, get 24 inch"G" model. TomsHardware says >>> it has about 1f of input lag. It uses a Twisted Nematic panel (TN). >>> >>> http://us.aoc.com/monitor_displays/g2460pqu >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:00 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> that's my monitor and I have no lag. >>> >>> best picture, however the cake is a lie. >>> >>> the bezel of the monitor is not as thin as in the picture. >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 06:21:10 +0000 >>> >>> IPS monitor? >>> >>> Im sure the lag is not in my head now. I dont think you get IPS >>> "gaming" monitors. >>> >>> IPS monitors give better colours and viewing angles but anything >>> gaming/performance/response related will be a TN panel. >>> >>> I would recommend going for a non IPS monitor >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 07:45:34 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Nope, this one >>> >>> http://www.kalahari.com/Technology/AOC-23-D2367PH-IPS-3D-Monitor_p_48293402 >>> On 4 Feb 2015 17:12, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Is this the AOC you're talking about nic? >>> http://www.wootware.co.za/aoc-e2370sd-23-1920x1080-led-monitor.html >>> >>> Anyone have any experience with LG mp55hq? >>> http://www.wootware.co.za/lg-23mp55hq-23-ips.html >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir < >>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Pretty good, 3k. >>> On 4 Feb 2015 15:14, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> How are the AOC screens in terms of lag? how much are they? need to >>> get a screen for my pc... >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> *LOL* >>> Cool bro. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:54 PM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Np mz, you know where to find me whoever feels like pressing buttons. >>> On 04 Feb 2015 2:32 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> He is going out tonight so he won't attend and that includes me too :( >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'm easy just let me know. What about Sap? >>> On 04 Feb 2015 1:37 PM, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Haha, nah it's no worries bro. Next time. >>> >>> Actually about tonight, is it only Khan, Nic and I? (I know Salie is a >>> maybe) >>> >>> Should we postpone to next week? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> :( >>> >>> Sadly I have obligations that could not get out of in Paarl this evening >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:25:06 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Paas plz. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Btw im sadly not going to be able to make it to tonights session >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:06:04 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> Zidane has been beasting with that Leo on Spooky's stream for a while >>> now. Mynus is probably the best Ino player in the states (he usually gets >>> bopped by Zidane though). >>> >>> Playing against Faust seems frustrating, his neutral game is really >>> solid. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Ah Apex. >>> >>> I watched the that on stream. >>> >>> Was good. Leo & Ino in top 3... Was pretty hype when Leo reset against >>> Faust in Grand finals. >>> >>> Fuck the meteors tho :P >>> ------------------------------ >>> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:31:29 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> I think Manase meant Apex? >>> On 4 Feb 2015 11:30, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> They need to make a complete version of Soul Calibur 5! with all the >>> original cast...Alpha Pat can't replace Setsuka! PAX is this March i >>> think. Boston? On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Wynand-Ben < >>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Its hard for me... 2D has GG 3D has >>> Sour Kariba What/where was the Pax tourney? Was stuff recorded/streamed? >>> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:04:06 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2D fighters all the >>> way!!! You lost me Nick when you mentioned MK... Enough about the doomed 3D >>> fighting game genre and more GG XRD please. I see at PAX there were no >>> strong Sol players instead lots of tier whoring... On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at >>> 10:43 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: If you >>> were stuck on an island somewhere, would you choose to have current 2d >>> plane fighting games with you, or current 3d plane games with you. I know >>> where I stand, I'll miss Jojo's ASB tho. As a fighting game fan, I think >>> it's a decline in the 3d interest. I believe the reason is that the >>> characters are simply too similar. The 3d movement is the same for most. >>> The movesets too similar. It's something I disliked about MK as well... to >>> some extent anyway. On 4 Feb 2015 09:41, "Donaldson, Alasdair" < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: VF5 – people realise it is boring >>> and don’t play it much T6:BR – Tekken scene declines. Yeah, it’s sneaky >>> how they follow the VF trends. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ryan Williams Sent: >>> 04 February 2015 8:55 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: DRE: >>> CTS community mail It was 'borrowed' from Virtua Fighter. You can trace >>> these things back to VF2 days. VF2 - Sega adds characters with 3D axis >>> movement T2 - Namco follows suit VF3 - Sega adds undulating stages and a >>> new 'evade' mechanic (Essentially a sidestep button but multi-purpose). >>> Some stages are also enclosed (have walls). T3 - Namco also introduces a >>> sidestep mechanic. The walls and undulating stages first make an appearance >>> in T4. VF5 - Sega introduces a B! mechanic. T6 - Namco introduces a B! >>> mechanic. If you follow the chronology of these releases, you will see that >>> Namco would typically release a new Tekken a year (sometimes more) or so >>> after the release of a new Virtua Fighter. On 4 Feb 2015 08:38, "richard >>> moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Who's mechanic then?? >>> Some other fighter?? On Feb 4, 2015 8:30 AM, "Ryan Williams" < >>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Because it was never their mechanic to >>> begin with. On 4 Feb 2015 07:52, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: Dear Namco, How can you not get the main system mechanic right? Oh I >>> forgot it's all about them juggles ;) From a few matches I saw Bryan is >>> another victim of this system change, Mr Naps got owned in a Japanese >>> tournament because of weak combos. On 3 Feb 2015 17:14, "Di Lhong" < >>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: This is according to current version. Not >>> sure how he'll end up though. But he's one of the few characters who >>> doesn't suffer from not having B! On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:33 PM, >>> Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Sweet. He's >>> been threatening to move out the mid-tiers for a while now. Sent from my >>> Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Di Lhong<mailto: >>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: 2015-02-03 16:28 To: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: DRE: >>> CTS community mail Good news for Paul in T7. JDCR and Knee said he's top >>> tier. A lot of the characters got indirect nerf from removing B!... Law is >>> bottom tier. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> >>> wrote: How will tricking Di into getting an xbone get you more friends? >>> Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: lindsey >>> kiviets<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> >>> Sent: 2015-02-03 16:07 To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail It was >>> worth a try. :( i hav no friends ________________________________ Date: >>> Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:02:18 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> LB plz. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:57 PM, >>> lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote: >>> Get a xbone. There a dude on the forum selling one for 4800 with 2 games >>> ________________________________ Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:48:20 +0200 >>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Anyone know the price of a PS3 console >>> nowadays? i think it's time for me to invest in one lolz On Tue, Feb 3, >>> 2015 at 3:39 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote: Ky > From: >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: >>> Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:34:05 +0000 > > I have retreated to the mountains to >>> improve my Kai game. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > >>> ________________________________ > From: sameegh jardine<mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>> > Sent: 2015-02-03 14:57 > To: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> > Subject: Re: >>> DRE: CTS community mail > > Stu plz. > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, >>> Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx><mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote: > -1 for a session. > > Sent >>> from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Nicholas >>> Robertson-Muir<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>>> > Sent: 2015-02-03 14:30 > To: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> > Subject: Re: >>> DRE: CTS community mail > > > +1 for session. > > On 3 Feb 2015 14:24, >>> "Sameegh Jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > +1 if there's a session > > On >>> 03 Feb 2015, at 2:12 PM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx >>> >><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>>><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> euraima@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > > > >>> Are we sessioning tomorrow? Let me know who's keen? > > On 03 Feb 2015 1:55 >>> PM, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> ><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >>> >><mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > lol, this >>> makes me remember the time you had an argument with the guy at Wonderland >>> around the buttons/sticks they use as opposed to the Japanese brands > > On >>> Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > And charge +- R4000 for that shit. >>> > Are they fucking mad !!!?? > > > > Rant over > back to work > > On 3 >>> February 2015 at 13:32, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > It actually makes me fucking >>> furious that these shit eating cock ring coasters think they can slap a few >>> rands worth of antiquated electronics and a pirated bootleg ass broken PCB >>> in to some cheap chip board and try call it a retro arcade cabinet. > Shit >>> is fake first of all and secondly there is a huge difference between retro >>> and plain old broken shit. > > > > On 3 February 2015 at 13:16, Stephen >>> Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > I >>> could never buy such poor cabs. > They are overpriced and terribly made >>> with wrong everything. > The thing that pisses me off is that these fucking >>> vultures are ripping people off > that don't know better. > > These are not >>> game koppe > fuck them. > > On 3 February 2015 at 11:30, Manase Zote < >>> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx >>> >>><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx><mailto: >>> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx><mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>>>>> wrote: > > Lol > The controls need an overhaul >>> since sanwa/seimatsu parts are not only better but also different from our >>> local ones which suck ass. > > On 3 Feb 2015 10:33, "lindsey kiviets" < >>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto: >>> >>> ... >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has b >>> >>> ...