RE: CTS community mail
- From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:27:07 +0000
Its a normal mini USB cable
It was the standard before the current micro USB cable
It plugs in into older accessories, external hard drives etc.
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:48:23 +0000
tsek , why would I know the answer?
If I knew I wouldn't ask.
Its not a normal everyday, phone and speaker cable. its a synch cable. I have a
similar cable at home but it doesn't charge my ps3 controller.
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:42:16 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lol.
Na, he's just using his "mash" technique.
He basically throws out stuff until something connects.
In this case, he knew what the right approach would be, ignored it, and
"mashed" out a question.
I responded, mostly because I'm hard at work, and wanted a deviation.
I think he knew the answer before he asked anyway.
Oh, and scrap Kalahari. They don't have anything worth tbe trouble.
On 5 Jan 2015 11:31, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You’re an enabler, Nic. If you don’t force LB to do stuff himself, he’ll be
useless when he grows up.
Looks like I probably won’t be shipping off to the UK. That’s good news. It was
supposed to be 3-6 months. Guess I have no choice
now but to learn xrd…
I see that they’re moved the Carnival/Parade thing. I don’t what the PC terms
for it these days is, so I’ll just leave it at that.
Will now be on Saturday. I was hoping for an excuse to work from home today
since they’ll shut off my route from the office to home. Guess not.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 05 January 2015 10:49 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
Don't scold our LB... he's special.
On 5 Jan 2015 10:14, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
What are you, 10 years old?
Since you seem incapable of doing even basic things like using google or
shopping for cables, maybe
you should just give us your uncle’s contact details and we can explain to him
where to buy the cable for you.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 05 January 2015 10:10 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
where can I find one?
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:59:57 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
R80
On 5 Jan 2015 09:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
anyone have an extra synch cable that I can use?
how much is one ?
need to beat DS, im almost done, I think. I need to beat the 4 kings.
From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 07:47:50 +0000
Back in CT.
I see the release date for MKX is April this year. All good. Lao is back.
Now I just need to spend some time getting to know Xrd before everyone else
runs away with the game.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 05 January 2015 9:19 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
morning peeps,
How come you guys didn't play omega edition? its fun.
@sap, I need to see born invincible.
Keybox should be bant
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:08:24 +0200
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Keybox+paas=best
On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hehe... sure.
On 4 Jan 2015 21:23, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minor details
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:34:50 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's because you never blocked it, lol.
On 4 Jan 2015 19:46, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That DP of his
Quite annoying.
Apparently its -22 on block... didnt feel that bad.
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:38:48 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lol. Whatever.
After about 30 or so losses, I started to hold my own.
...and that's with day-1-Axl.
Paas knows I'm coming for him. :D
On 4 Jan 2015 16:52, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
she needs to be bant
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:53:01 +0200
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paas *lol* Elphelt too stronk.
On 4 Jan 2015 15:50, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So who is da bes at guilty giiya ? :P
On Friday, January 2, 2015, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You would thrive with a rush-down character.
On 2 Jan 2015 18:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord, he feels
odd, and nothing like Billy.
For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong buttons for
his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other configuration on the
first GG.
I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me.
On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit the
lab.
...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20.
On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
@Nick,
So no potemkin on Saturday???
@ SAP
FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!!
On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me?
Can't...stop...playing...
On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime
On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lol no,
i hear langebaan is nice.
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at session
On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
whered you go for the holidays?
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it believe me
On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
il be there
coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good way to
start the year off.
filthy, you better come to the sesh
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want too
On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry to hear that Rich.
On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I can't make the new years session its so sad
On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cool
Im there.
Guilty
Gear
Eks
Hard
!
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
This Sat at Jeeva's :)
On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sooo
When is the next session?
Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :(
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200
Subject: RE: CTS community mail
From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session...
On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken.
i dont like revenge movies.
I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded so
familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol
I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk smack
now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all.
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the action
scenes are top notch.
On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the end
telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in
NSMB!"
On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this for a
while.
Stupid lol of the day:
Beyond Thug Life (Beyond Scared Straight)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*LOL*
That Jean though...
And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol*
On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ex-Men: Jean Grey
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd also
have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually
exclusive states.
Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce 1. To
unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in this case you
are married and unmarried.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would be
required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed
a married or unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the
Excluded Middle or Double Negation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the name
of animals (not people), which would either mean
the answer is False or undecidable.
But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor to
handle that.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked will be
held true for either the first or second statement.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
By the way, here's a riddle:
Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married. Charlie
is not.
Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to
this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in
error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the
official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity
for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address
with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender,
then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in
this e-mail and any attachments
that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor
endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity
for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
Other related posts:
