R80 On 5 Jan 2015 09:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > anyone have an extra synch cable that I can use? > > how much is one ? > > need to beat DS, im almost done, I think. I need to beat the 4 kings. > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 07:47:50 +0000 > > Back in CT. > > > > I see the release date for MKX is April this year. All good. Lao is back. > > Now I just need to spend some time getting to know Xrd before everyone > else runs away with the game. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 05 January 2015 9:19 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: CTS community mail > > > > morning peeps, > > How come you guys didn't play omega edition? its fun. > > @sap, I need to see born invincible. > > Keybox should be bant > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:08:24 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Keybox+paas=best > > On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hehe... sure. > > On 4 Jan 2015 21:23, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Minor details > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:34:50 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > That's because you never blocked it, lol. > > On 4 Jan 2015 19:46, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That DP of his > > > > Quite annoying. > > > > Apparently its -22 on block... didnt feel that bad. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:38:48 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Lol. Whatever. > > After about 30 or so losses, I started to hold my own. > ...and that's with day-1-Axl. > > Paas knows I'm coming for him. :D > > On 4 Jan 2015 16:52, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > she needs to be bant > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:53:01 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Paas *lol* Elphelt too stronk. > > On 4 Jan 2015 15:50, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So who is da bes at guilty giiya ? :P > > On Friday, January 2, 2015, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You would thrive with a rush-down character. > > On 2 Jan 2015 18:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord, he > feels odd, and nothing like Billy. > For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong > buttons for his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other > configuration on the first GG. > I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me. > > On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit > the lab. > > ...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20. > > On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @Nick, > So no potemkin on Saturday??? > > @ SAP > FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!! > > On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me? > > Can't...stop...playing... > > On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime > > On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > lol no, > > i hear langebaan is nice. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at > session > > On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > whered you go for the holidays? > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it > believe me > > On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > il be there > > coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good way to > start the year off. > > filthy, you better come to the sesh > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want too > > On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry to hear that Rich. > > On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I can't make the new years session its so sad > > On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Cool > > > > Im there. > > > > Guilty > > Gear > > Eks > > Hard > > ! > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > This Sat at Jeeva's :) > > On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sooo > > > > When is the next session? > > > > > > Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :( > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session... > > On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken. > > i dont like revenge movies. > > I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded > so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol > > I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk > smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the > action scenes are top notch. > > On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the > end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!" > > On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this > for a while. > > > > Stupid lol of the day: > Beyond Thug Life (Beyond Scared Straight) > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be> > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > *LOL* > > That Jean though... > > And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol* > > On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Ex-Men: Jean Grey <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY> > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd > also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive > states. > > Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce 1. > To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in this > case you are married and unmarried. > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would > be required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or > unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded > Middle or Double Negation. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic > > Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the > name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is False > or undecidable. > > But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor to > handle that. > > > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked > will be held true for either the first or second statement. > > > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > By the way, here's a riddle: > > Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married. > Charlie is not. > > Is a married person looking at an unmarried person? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >