What are you, 10 years old? Since you seem incapable of doing even basic things like using google or shopping for cables, maybe you should just give us your uncle's contact details and we can explain to him where to buy the cable for you. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets Sent: 05 January 2015 10:10 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: CTS community mail where can I find one? ________________________________ Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:59:57 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> R80 On 5 Jan 2015 09:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: anyone have an extra synch cable that I can use? how much is one ? need to beat DS, im almost done, I think. I need to beat the 4 kings. ________________________________ From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: CTS community mail Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 07:47:50 +0000 Back in CT. I see the release date for MKX is April this year. All good. Lao is back. Now I just need to spend some time getting to know Xrd before everyone else runs away with the game. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets Sent: 05 January 2015 9:19 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: CTS community mail morning peeps, How come you guys didn't play omega edition? its fun. @sap, I need to see born invincible. Keybox should be bant ________________________________ Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:08:24 +0200 Subject: Re: CTS community mail From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Keybox+paas=best On Sunday, January 4, 2015, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Hehe... sure. On 4 Jan 2015 21:23, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Minor details ________________________________ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:34:50 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> That's because you never blocked it, lol. On 4 Jan 2015 19:46, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: That DP of his Quite annoying. Apparently its -22 on block... didnt feel that bad. ________________________________ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 17:38:48 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Lol. Whatever. After about 30 or so losses, I started to hold my own. ...and that's with day-1-Axl. Paas knows I'm coming for him. :D On 4 Jan 2015 16:52, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: she needs to be bant ________________________________ Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:53:01 +0200 Subject: Re: CTS community mail From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Paas *lol* Elphelt too stronk. On 4 Jan 2015 15:50, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: So who is da bes at guilty giiya ? :P On Friday, January 2, 2015, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: You would thrive with a rush-down character. On 2 Jan 2015 18:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord, he feels odd, and nothing like Billy. For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong buttons for his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other configuration on the first GG. I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me. On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit the lab. ...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20. On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: @Nick, So no potemkin on Saturday??? @ SAP FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!! On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me? Can't...stop...playing... On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: lol no, i hear langebaan is nice. ________________________________ Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at session On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: whered you go for the holidays? ________________________________ Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it believe me On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: il be there coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good way to start the year off. filthy, you better come to the sesh ________________________________ Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want too On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Sorry to hear that Rich. On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: I can't make the new years session its so sad On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Cool Im there. Guilty Gear Eks Hard ! ________________________________ Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> This Sat at Jeeva's :) On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Sooo When is the next session? Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :( ________________________________ Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200 Subject: RE: CTS community mail From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session... On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken. i dont like revenge movies. I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all. ________________________________ Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200 Subject: Re: CTS community mail From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the action scenes are top notch. On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!" On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this for a while. Stupid lol of the day: Beyond Thug Life (Beyond Scared Straight)<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: *LOL* That Jean though... And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol* On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Ex-Men: Jean Grey<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY> ________________________________ Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200 Subject: Re: CTS community mail From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive states. Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce 1. To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in this case you are married and unmarried. On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would be required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded Middle or Double Negation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is False or undecidable. But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor to handle that. On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked will be held true for either the first or second statement. On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: By the way, here's a riddle: Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married. Charlie is not. Is a married person looking at an unmarried person? ________________________________ The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. ********************************************************************** The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software.