Lol. Whatever. After about 30 or so losses, I started to hold my own. ...and that's with day-1-Axl. Paas knows I'm coming for him. :D On 4 Jan 2015 16:52, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > she needs to be bant > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 15:53:01 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Paas *lol* Elphelt too stronk. > On 4 Jan 2015 15:50, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So who is da bes at guilty giiya ? :P > > On Friday, January 2, 2015, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You would thrive with a rush-down character. > On 2 Jan 2015 18:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord, he > feels odd, and nothing like Billy. > For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong > buttons for his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other > configuration on the first GG. > I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me. > On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit > the lab. > > ...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20. > On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @Nick, > So no potemkin on Saturday??? > > @ SAP > FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!! > On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me? > > Can't...stop...playing... > On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime > On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > lol no, > > i hear langebaan is nice. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at > session > On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > whered you go for the holidays? > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it > believe me > On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > il be there > > coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good way to > start the year off. > > filthy, you better come to the sesh > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want too > On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry to hear that Rich. > On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I can't make the new years session its so sad > On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Cool > > Im there. > > Guilty > Gear > Eks > Hard > ! > > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > This Sat at Jeeva's :) > On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sooo > > When is the next session? > > > Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :( > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session... > On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken. > > i dont like revenge movies. > > I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded > so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol > > I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk > smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all. > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the > action scenes are top notch. > On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the end > telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!" > > On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this > for a while. > > > Stupid lol of the day: > Beyond Thug Life (Beyond Scared Straight) > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be> > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > *LOL* > > That Jean though... > > And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol* > On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Ex-Men: Jean Grey <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY> > ------------------------------ > Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd > also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive > states. > > Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce 1. > To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in this > case you are married and unmarried. > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would be > required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or > unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded > Middle or Double Negation. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic > > Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the > name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is False > or undecidable. > > But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor to > handle that. > > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked will > be held true for either the first or second statement. > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > By the way, here's a riddle: > > Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married. > Charlie is not. > > Is a married person looking at an unmarried person? > > > > > > > > >