RE: CTS community mail
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 18:38:34 +0200
On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord, he
feels odd, and nothing like Billy.
For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong buttons
for his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other configuration
on the first GG.
I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me.
On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit
> the lab.
>
> ...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20.
> On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> @Nick,
>> So no potemkin on Saturday???
>>
>> @ SAP
>> FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!!
>> On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me?
>>>
>>> Can't...stop...playing...
>>> On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime
>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> lol no,
>>>>>
>>>>> i hear langebaan is nice.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at
>>>>> session
>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> whered you go for the holidays?
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it
>>>>> believe me
>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> il be there
>>>>>
>>>>> coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good
>>>>> way to start the year off.
>>>>>
>>>>> filthy, you better come to the sesh
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want
>>>>> too
>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry to hear that Rich.
>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't make the new years session its so sad
>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool
>>>>>
>>>>> Im there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Guilty
>>>>> Gear
>>>>> Eks
>>>>> Hard
>>>>> !
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> This Sat at Jeeva's :)
>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sooo
>>>>>
>>>>> When is the next session?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :(
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session...
>>>>> On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken.
>>>>>
>>>>> i dont like revenge movies.
>>>>>
>>>>> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father
>>>>> sounded so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol
>>>>>
>>>>> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk
>>>>> smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the
>>>>> action scenes are top notch.
>>>>> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the
>>>>> end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!"
>>>>>
>>>>> On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing
>>>>> this for a while.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Stupid lol of the day:
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> *LOL*
>>>>>
>>>>> That Jean though...
>>>>>
>>>>> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol*
>>>>> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that
>>>>> you'd also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive
>>>>> states.
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce
>>>>> 1. To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in
>>>>> this case you are married and unmarried.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would
>>>>> be required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or
>>>>> unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded
>>>>> Middle or Double Negation.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be
>>>>> the name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is
>>>>> False or undecidable.
>>>>>
>>>>> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's
>>>>> Razor to handle that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked
>>>>> will be held true for either the first or second statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, here's a riddle:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married.
>>>>> Charlie is not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Other related posts:
