RE: CTS community mail
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:03:48 +0200
Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I hit
the lab.
...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20.
On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @Nick,
> So no potemkin on Saturday???
>
> @ SAP
> FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!!
> On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me?
>>
>> Can't...stop...playing...
>> On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime
>>> On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> lol no,
>>>>
>>>> i hear langebaan is nice.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too at
>>>> session
>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> whered you go for the holidays?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss it
>>>> believe me
>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> il be there
>>>>
>>>> coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys, good way
>>>> to start the year off.
>>>>
>>>> filthy, you better come to the sesh
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i want
>>>> too
>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry to hear that Rich.
>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I can't make the new years session its so sad
>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Cool
>>>>
>>>> Im there.
>>>>
>>>> Guilty
>>>> Gear
>>>> Eks
>>>> Hard
>>>> !
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> This Sat at Jeeva's :)
>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sooo
>>>>
>>>> When is the next session?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday :(
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session...
>>>> On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken.
>>>>
>>>> i dont like revenge movies.
>>>>
>>>> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father
>>>> sounded so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol
>>>>
>>>> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk
>>>> smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the
>>>> action scenes are top notch.
>>>> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the
>>>> end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!"
>>>>
>>>> On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing
>>>> this for a while.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stupid lol of the day:
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *LOL*
>>>>
>>>> That Jean though...
>>>>
>>>> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol*
>>>> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd
>>>> also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive
>>>> states.
>>>>
>>>> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce
>>>> 1. To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in
>>>> this case you are married and unmarried.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would
>>>> be required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or
>>>> unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded
>>>> Middle or Double Negation.
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
>>>>
>>>> Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be
>>>> the name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is
>>>> False or undecidable.
>>>>
>>>> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor
>>>> to handle that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked
>>>> will be held true for either the first or second statement.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> By the way, here's a riddle:
>>>>
>>>> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married.
>>>> Charlie is not.
>>>>
>>>> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Other related posts:
