Re: CTS community mail
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:41:07 +0200
...because if he changed the original, it would mean the first one was
wrong...
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm stuck at work drawing up a document to substantiate our claim that we
> should not have to pay a 3rd party company for work they delivered to us
> (late, and incomplete). Basically I have to go through the source code and
> find examples of bad practice, incorrect logic and poor code quality. Some
> of the stuff won't really be understood by non-developers, but in other
> cases you have gems like these:
>
> var *drop_off_uqantities* = vm_drop.statusPublicationList();
>> for(var c = 0; c < *drop_off_uqantities*.length; c++ ){
>>
>
> Note the bolded part. He obviously meant to type *drop_off_quantities*,
> but he was so lazy to fix the error he just repeated it 15 times after that
> so he wouldn't have to go back to change the original mistake.
>
Other related posts:
