Apparently the technique only works for predictive AoE. You have to run in a circle because the AI casts in your path, so if you run in a circle the prediction will fall tangential to your path which will miss you. On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Turn 5 kill. These guys say they have found a way to beat the lag. I'm > trying to see it. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDJde_SZfNw > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Was buying, but I'm levelling my botanist now so hopefully I can gather >> it soon. It's not that expensive to buy though especially if I supplement >> it with profits from HQ sales. >> >> Myself, Khan and LB beat AV the next time we ran it. All it took was for >> LB to start playing his Tank like a tank and not a bus. Only lost aggro >> once, made it all the way to the last boss without wiping on an >> insignificant monster. When we beat the boss he was on his 5th sow already >> but we didn't even break a sweat. Found a legit strat to take him. Then I >> found out I had to do it again for GC company. Did it again with a random >> team who had never seen the last boss. >> >> Afterwards we ran CM with Khan. Everyone was like "Erm... LB >> Thesummoner, is this your first time here?" He was pulling every trash mob >> he could lay his hands on. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> You gathering the flax yourself or just buying it?**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama >>> *Sent:* 28 October 2013 11:07 AM >>> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> *Subject:* [CPT-FGC] Re: [CPT-RPG] Re: Stuff off**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Yeah I hit 40 last night. I'll meld for you tonight.**** >>> >>> I calculated that for the levequest I'm doing now it costs me 90 flax >>> per triple turn-in.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> How far you gonna take culninarian Lb? What level you currently at?**** >>> >>> @ilit you got level 40 Weaver yet? I need some melding done.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> ------------------------------ >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>> AntiVirus software. >>> >> >> >