Re: [cpsig] Economics of replacing steam

  • From: "KVRailway" <kvrailway@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <cpsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:46:40 -0800

Where was this ride, Doug?

Joe Smuin

1. - "Joey, the secret to telling a good railway story is to always try to stick just as close to the facts as possible." --- (the late) Cliff Inkster; CPR Engineman, raconteur and philosopher.
2. - The secret to contacting Joe by email is to be sure to insert "Joe" or "Smuin" into the main text portion of any message you send to him, and thus your message should percolate through his spam filters.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Cummings" <DougCummings@xxxxxxx>
To: <cpsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [cpsig] Economics of replacing steam






Theoretically a steam engine has no limit on the amount of horsepower it can
generate.  In practicality the limit is the amount of steam the boiler can
produce.  Hence a typical rating for a steam engine was boiler horsepower
rather than draw bar horse power.

--This can go on forever. At speed a steam locomotive can develop tremendous
horsepower and move a lot of tonnage and use just about no water or fuel
doing it. I've ridden steam locomotives at speed with little more than a
spot fire and the cutoff set at perhaps 5 percent or less and we clipped off
mile after mile burning very little fuel and using hardly any water. We also
managed to cook our own meals and make coffee without the need for a
microwave oven or a hot plate.

Diesels doing the same work would be at notch 8 and burning fuel like it was
going out of style.

Doug



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






Other related posts: