Hello Dan and Zaquie,
My comment was only in reference to the concept of the body as a machine.
All for now...
Anngwyn
In a message dated 9/4/2012 11:57:36 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
danboothcohen@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Dear Zaquie –
I like your questions better than I like my answers. This has been a
wonderful thread and I appreciate all the perspectives and input. Maybe in
a
few months, after working in the field with the 3 dimensions of
consciousness plus 1, I will be more informed. For now, it feels more
accurate to say I do not have solid answers.
My reading of Anngwyn’s response was that she was simply hitting reply to
the most recent response and adding to the larger conversation, not
directing her comment specifically to you. She can speak for herself, but I
offer my impression. She is extensively researching nuclear radiation in
the
environment, especially from Fukushima. And also the string of mass public
shootings we have in the States on a weekly basis. He contribution speaks
to
that.
Dan
From: _ConstellationTalk@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
[mailto:_ConstellationTalk@yahoogroups.com_ ;
(mailto:ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ] On Behalf Of Zaquie Meredith
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 7:38 PM
To: _ConstellationTalk@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: re:RE: [ConstellationTalk] "I mean, we are machines, after all. We
have all these ethical and social over-layers, but the body is a machine."
Dear Dan
I have 4 questions if you may answer me, please:
1.Don¹t you consider that this kind of artifical, manufactured
consciousness
that is mass produced and implanted inside us might be just a natural
non-avoidable evolution of humanity?
And as such, it is not yet being recognized so that it can not be
included?
Perhaps precisely because it has not been recognizable ?(independent if it
³should² or not)
2. What is beyond thru the field of the ancestors isn¹t it considered a
greater field which Sheldrake speaks (a field within another field always
greater that the one before)moving onwards and upwards or would you
consider
that it might be close to what Hellinger calls it a spirit movement ?
3.When you speak of this dimension of consciounsness imbedded in us by the
machines would you say that the dimension of Propagandas ­
(consciousness
imbedded in us 24 h by the midia) is just exactly the same? But..does it
make sense to say that we exclude this consciousness when we include our
ancestors? Doesn't it make more sense to say that we forget the power these
dimensions have on us even including our ancestors?
4.Arent we talking about evolution even if it is a machine or not machine?
Remember Family Constellations originally are more of a repetitive pattern
rather than an evolutionary model?
Zaquie C Meredith,sociologist, psychotherapy and writer
S.Paulo, Brazil
www.zaquie.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
