Directo, pero así son los alemanes y me fascina no creo que hay mala intención.
Es mi pensar desde un punto de vista cultural y quizás tu ingles se mal
entendió y no por ello te juzgamos -- tema interesante pero no quiero perder de
vista LOS NIÑOS
Rosabelle White Aguirre de Rice
Federally Certified Spanish Interpreter and Certified Medical Interpreter
Solutions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
3036640852
Cell 7208389509
On Sep 4, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Zaquie Meredith <zaquie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not really. If you read my questions you will see that this was not the
case. We are speaking of constellations and exploring what is beyond that.
It may be that I misunderstood your comment but for an international forum
it did sound rude.
Thank you.
Zaquie
From: <anngwyn@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:18:02 -0400 (EDT)
To: <ConstellationTalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ConstellationTalk] "I mean, we are machines, after all. We
have all thes...
Hello Again!
Now we have entered the highly controversial realm of "trans-humanism" .. a
huge, complex , emotionally charged topic ...involving many historical and
cross cultural levels...and much reflection about what is human and what
is not and who decides and how do they know ?
Warm Regards,
Anngwyn
_www.acst-international.com_ (http://www.acst-international.com)
_http://anngwyn.wisrville.org_ ;(http://anngwyn.wisrville.org)
In a message dated 9/4/2012 4:38:26 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
zaquie@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:zaquie%40zaquie.com> writes:
Dear Dan
I have 4 questions if you may answer me, please:
1.Don¹t you consider that this kind of artifical, manufactured
consciousness
that is mass produced and implanted inside us might be just a natural
non-avoidable evolution of humanity?
And as such, it is not yet being recognized so that it can not be included
?
Perhaps precisely because it has not been recognizable ?(independent if it
³should² or not)
2. What is beyond thru the field of the ancestors isn¹t it considered a
greater field which Sheldrake speaks (a field within another field always
greater that the one before)moving onwards and upwards or would you
consider
that it might be close to what Hellinger calls it a spirit movement ?
3.When you speak of this dimension of consciounsness imbedded in us by the
machines would you say that the dimension of Propagandas ­
(consciousness
imbedded in us 24 h by the midia) is just exactly the same? But..does it
make sense to say that we exclude this consciousness when we include our
ancestors? Doesn't it make more sense to say that we forget the power these
dimensions have on us even including our ancestors?
4.Arent we talking about evolution even if it is a machine or not machine?
Remember Family Constellations originally are more of a repetitive pattern
rather than an evolutionary model?
Zaquie C Meredith,sociologist, psychotherapy and writer
S.Paulo, Brazil
www.zaquie.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
