[ciphershed] Re: FW: [TCNext] Serious development to start soon
- From: "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx>
- To: <ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:48:13 -0400
Going on now.
Alain
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ciphershed-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ciphershed-
>bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niklas Lemcke - ???
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 09:31
>To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ciphershed] Re: FW: [TCNext] Serious development to start soon
>
>Would you two mind coming on IRC to discuss these few things in real
>time?
>
>On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:24:55 +0800
>Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬 <compul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:22:32 +0100
>> Pid Zero <p1dz3r0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > I'd never realised how much the name CipherShed bothers me until I saw
>it
>> > on twitter earlier.
>>
>> How does it bother you?
>>
>> >
>> > On Friday, June 27, 2014, Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬
><compul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:47:00 -0400
>> > > "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > >-----Original Message-----
>> > > <snip/>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >I think it'll be fine. We have a PMC now, and a first (at least
>> > > > >preliminary) meeting tomorrow.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > As I think I mentioned in another thread, I'm not sure tomorrow's
>> > > meeting can double as a PMC meeting, since only Bill, Niklas, and Alain
>are
>> > > confirmed to be there, which isn't even a majority of the PMC. I really
>> > > hope the whole PMC will show up, but I doubt we can count on it. We
>(you?
>> > > since you're "chairing" the first meeting) should maybe consider
>scheduling
>> > > a meeting?
>> > >
>> > > Which is why I called it "preliminary".
>> > >
>> > > I will try to do so, but the lack of response from Frank (he mentioned
>> > > he's fine today, but that won't work), and the unclear situation for
>> > > Stephen (no mic etc?) don't make that an easy task.
>> > >
>> > > Apart from those two, there is only Chris and Jason left, both of whom
>> > > did not tell us when they would be good (as far as I know). I had
>> > > interpreted that as "Saturday is OK"--it's a weekend afterall.
>> > >
>> > > @Jason @Chris: is that the case? If not, when would it fit for you?
>> > >
>> > > Niklas
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Alain
>> > > >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Hopefully the PMC can get our act together fast enough (there is
>now
>> > > more
>> > > > >urgency) such that this won't be a problem. However, I'm much more
>> > > > >disturbed that we made a clear and direct request to Jos, which
>seems to
>> > > > >have not been taken seriously. Not a good start for any kind of
>> > > collaborative
>> > > > >relationship. If we're going to work together, this kind of thing
>> > > cannot happen.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >I agree. That should be stated very clearly tomorrow on mumble.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Alain
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Niklas
>> > >
>> > > At the time of writing, no warrants have ever been served to me, Niklas
>> > > Lemcke, nor am I under any personal legal compulsion concerning the
>> > > CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches or seizures of my
>> > > assets.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>--
>Niklas
>
>At the time of writing, no warrants have ever been served to me, Niklas
>Lemcke, nor am I under any personal legal compulsion concerning the
>CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches or seizures of my
>assets.
Other related posts: