> The following was supposedly scribed by > Guy Edwards > on Thursday 04 September 2003 03:47 pm: >Ok whats standard practise for resolving naming issues >between projects/commercial companies? > I believe that OpenOffice.org is the formal name for what was the "OpenOffice" project because of just such a situation. It seems that the easiest and least confrontational method is to reinvent your name (can you think of a recursively-defined acronym for viewer?) >What should/can a free project do to copyright its' name? I'm pretty sure you can only protect it via a registered trademark. A copyright is not going to help much in terms of names (similar to the issue that you can't copyright a title.) Remember I'm not a lawyer (I just play one on the internet.) --Eric