[cad-linux] [devel] Getting Bruno's draft to run
- From: Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx>
- To: cad-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:27:05 +0200
Bruno Postle said: (by the date of Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:43:25 +0100)
man, this is frustrating...
> > about FAM: WARNING: PRCS_PROJECT is not a known parameter.
> > FAM.xs:11: fam.h: No such file or directory
> libfam-dev package.
I installed this package, and then:
absurd:~# perl -MCPAN -e 'install SGI::FAM'
[....]
Manifying blib/man1/monitor.1p
/usr/bin/make -- OK
Running make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/fam....Can't locate Test/Helper.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/root/.cpan/build/SGI-FAM-1.002/blib/lib
/root/.cpan/build/SGI-FAM-1.002/blib/arch /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.0
/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.0 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8.0
/usr/share/perl/5.8.0 /usr/local/lib/site_perl . /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.0 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.0 /usr/lib/perl5
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8.0 /usr/share/perl/5.8.0
/usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at t/fam.t line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/fam.t line 1.
t/fam....dubious
Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
[....]
full output is here: http://absurd.kozicki.pl:8435/Cad-Linux/FAMerror.txt
I suspect that my upgrade of perl from 5.6 to 5.8 didn't went smoothly
(although packages installed correctly) or this libfam-package is not
what perl expects it to be....
> > about Gtk:
>
> perl -MCPAN -e 'install Glib'
> perl -MCPAN -e 'install ExtUtils::Depends'
perl -MCPAN -e 'install ExtUtils::Depends' - installed correctly (to my
surprise ;)
but this: perl -MCPAN -e 'install Glib'
*** can not find package gobject-2.0
*** check that it is properly installed and available in PKG_CONFIG_PATH
at Makefile.PL line 16
full output is here:
http://absurd.kozicki.pl:8435/Cad-Linux/Gliberror.txt
====
I suspect that the main problem lies in fact that debian woody uses perl
5.6 by default and there may be defferences in whole system in respect
to that...
because currently our main concern is a directory data format I am going
to examine /t/ directory contents... and then
I will gather all our ideas throught this newsgroup that sparked two
weeks ago and plece them in a single clear file. I hope this will be a
good start to develop this format in a clear way. Hope this will happen
as soon as possible.
sadly it seems that we don't have a good place to talk about all this.
but nonetheless I am not willing to give up!
--
# Janek Kozicki
Other related posts:
