[bvipilots] Re: fs passenger or other add-ons

  • From: "Ron Kolesar" <kolesar16417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bvipilots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:34:19 -0400

Now for one who likes something to be a real as possible. 
this is a huge huge shame. 
Thanks for keeping us all up to date on this Robert.

Ron and current Leader Dog boz who states 
"that a service dog beats a cane paws down any day of the week."

From: Robert Cezar 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 8:38 PM
To: bvipilots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [bvipilots] Re: fs passenger or other add-ons


You are correct.  PMDG made a corporate decision after their original 737 
series, that they would no longer permit any programmatic control of any of 
their aircraft... a completely foolish notion in my opinion.  When developers 
screamed, they promised they would produce an SDK for us developers.... that 
was 4 years ago... we're still waiting.


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:45 PM, hadi <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote:

  By the way, Robert, i think pmdg's 777 is coming out pretty soon. it wouldn't 
get interfaced with IYP right?
  Those real  engine and button sounds will look super cool :(( 

  On 8/29/2013 3:02 AM, hadi wrote:

    Please, do not install fs passangers
    it's right that it makes the flight more realistic, but while in flight it 
actually ruinds the atmosphere if you're flying with  michel.
    If you don't turn off all of its crash features, it keeps  damaging your 
aircraft while your ajusting flaps and landing gear in flight, or when you do a 
bank, passangers start screaming, because the bank seems "too sharp" for them.
    Finally, at landing, since michel can't pull off landing rates above -300 
most of the times,  your tire gets exploded and you hear  EMS and police sirons 
all over you, and the negative  rate of your bad landing will ruind all of the 
flight report generated by  FS passengers.
    (p.s with heavy aircrafts landing rates of -300 to -550 is considered ok, 

    On 8/28/2013 11:44 PM, Robert Cezar wrote:


      You can certainly use FS Passengers with IYP, however, the application 
will be completely out of sync with IYP. For example, when you say, "Pre-Flight 
Checklist", and the doors are not even opened as yet, FS Passengers will be 
greeting the passengers on board.  However, the taxi sounds are great, etc. So, 
if you do not care about the two applications making completely illogical 
environmental statements, give it a try.

      A better choice might be Accu-Feel from A2A simulations. 


      It also makes some out of context observations, but closer than FS 

      REGARDING: The Boeing 772 that you sent me

      I tried interfacing this aircraft once before. However, the Auto-Pilot on 
the plane cannot be controlled by FSUIPC. It's too bad that the developers made 
the decision to create an auto-pilot that is completely non-programmable.  I 
will try to control it via a means called "Super Classing", but I cannot make 
any promises that it will work.



      On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Mitchel Snel <brailletijger@xxxxxxxxx> 

        heey guys,
        I am continually searching for ad-ons that enrich my flight experience.
        so first I am wandering if you guys know any wanderfull add-ons
        besides iyp off course that can better my flight experience?
        secondly I have heared of fs passenger and I would like to know if it
        is something to consider as an extrqa add-on to use with iyp?
        thanks in advance, Mitchel
        Blind and Visually impaired Pilots mailinglist
        To post a message to the list, send a message to
        To unsubscribe, send a message to
        bvipilots-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and put the word unsubscribe in the 
subject of your message.
        For other options such as digest, send a message to
        bvipilots-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and put the word help in the subject of 
your message.


      AOPA Member No: 06936977


AOPA Member No: 06936977

Other related posts: