[bvipilots] Re: How can you tell if your aircraft isaircraft equipped with the Garmin 500 GPS unit?

  • From: Robert Cezar <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bvipilots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 02:06:58 -0700

Say to Michelle... "Resume GPS navigation".

Robert


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Hadi Rezaei <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Hi Robert
> Acording to what you said, those commands will just show you visual
> guidance?
>
> P.S sorry for  late reply, fall asleep last night
>
>
> On 5/22/2014 4:13 AM, Robert Cezar wrote:
>
> Hello Hadi,
>
>  Please either read the Newsletter you received today, or go to the
> Revisions section of the site for the use of the GPS guidance to VOR, NDB
> or Intersectional waypoints.
>
>  Good luck with VATSIM.
>
>  Regards,
> Robert
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Hadi Rezaei <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  Hello
>> It's simple. the approach will first of all either clear you a visual
>> approach or ILS. if visual, i will *always* request an ILS approach, and
>> they will approve.
>> Here's the most complex communication that would happen in vatsim for
>> approach
>>
>> "Delta1022, expect visual approach runway 12L. do you have the  desni6d
>> approach procedure on board?"
>> "Approach, can we request an ILS approach via radar vectoring?"
>> "Delta1022, expect vectors for ILS approach runway  12L."
>> And there i go, all handled by ATC.
>> In USA, they will always vector you, either visual or  ILS, so i only
>> have to request ILS once they give me visual approach.
>> but in europe, (exclude UK), They mostly want you to fly the STAR, which
>> gets resolved by requesting an ILS approach.
>>
>> The situation that i explained regarding the "proceed direct to XXX"
>> mostly applies to one of these:
>> 1: After  takeoff, instead of doing the SID, ATC tells you to proceed
>> direct to <waypoint>
>> 2: When approaching, the amount of traffic is very high, thus the ATC
>> tries to shape the traffic in his own way so they could be headed for one
>> way in approach and not scattered all over the place, so they  direct all
>> the inbound aircrafts to a cirtain waypoint, then from there, they either
>> expect them to do the STAR, or  mostly radar vector them for landing.
>>
>> Strange, i have not seen the let's fly direct to V O R XXX command. is it
>> new? I'm sure the VOR navigation  commands was first  to set the frequency,
>> then tune in to the VOR and fly inbound.
>>
>>
>> On 5/22/2014 3:14 AM, Robert Cezar wrote:
>>
>> Hadi,
>>
>>  If you are going to be flying using VATSIM, and they instruct you to
>> descend and maintain FL 240 and proceed direct to V O R, E L W or N D B, X
>> X, simply say...
>>
>>  "Descend and maintain flight level 2 4 0".
>> "Michelle, let's fly direct to V O R, E L W."
>> "Resume GPS navigation".
>>
>>  Michelle will fly to that waypoint.
>>
>>  Then what?
>>
>>  ATC will likely direct you to make the approach via a STAR!  Now what?
>>
>>  Please advise.
>>
>>  Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Hadi Rezaei <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>  "Delta1022, descend and maintain flightlevel 240, proceed direct to
>>> LHGLUGLHLGUGLHLGULGUGHLGULHGHL"
>>> "Center request direct heading to hgluglhlgughlughl?"
>>> "Delta1022, turn left heading 240. after ghluglughlulgh cleared
>>> flightlevel 100"
>>>
>>> Um, michel? what do we do now you got any ideas?
>>> Michel: "Captain shut up its my plane."
>>> But i amm flying online I need to go to manual flying
>>> Michel: "It's your fault that you fly online, I will absolutely hold no
>>> responsibility for any explosions, damages and crashes to this aircraft
>>> once you take controls from me."
>>> Right! it's my plane. turn left heading 240,
>>> "Center I don't have any ideas about the position of  hlughlughlugh
>>> waypoint, let me know when i have to descend to fl100"
>>> "Delta1022 jees, roger".
>>>
>>> This is how you fly in online.  (JK do not do this in VATSIM, it's very
>>> hard~)
>>>
>>> Anyway, It would be so cool to see/read the waypoints around you and
>>> their direct BRG to them, but  possibly only for me, You really don't want
>>> to mess around like this when you're flying.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/22/2014 1:47 AM, Robert Cezar wrote:
>>>
>>> Regrettably, I see absolutely no need for this facility for BVI pilots.
>>> It is entirely a visual paradigm.
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Ron Kolesar <
>>> kolesar16417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the subject tells it all.
>>>> How can you tell if the aircraft you want to fly is equipped with the
>>>> Garmin 500 GPS unit?
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ron and current Leader Dog boz who states
>>>> "that a service dog beats a cane paws down any day of the week."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>>
>>>  AOPA Member No: 06936977
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>
>>
>>  AOPA Member No: 06936977
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
>
>
>  AOPA Member No: 06936977
>
>
>


-- 


AOPA Member No: 06936977

Other related posts: