Say to Michelle... "Resume GPS navigation". Robert On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Hadi Rezaei <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Robert > Acording to what you said, those commands will just show you visual > guidance? > > P.S sorry for late reply, fall asleep last night > > > On 5/22/2014 4:13 AM, Robert Cezar wrote: > > Hello Hadi, > > Please either read the Newsletter you received today, or go to the > Revisions section of the site for the use of the GPS guidance to VOR, NDB > or Intersectional waypoints. > > Good luck with VATSIM. > > Regards, > Robert > > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Hadi Rezaei <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hello >> It's simple. the approach will first of all either clear you a visual >> approach or ILS. if visual, i will *always* request an ILS approach, and >> they will approve. >> Here's the most complex communication that would happen in vatsim for >> approach >> >> "Delta1022, expect visual approach runway 12L. do you have the desni6d >> approach procedure on board?" >> "Approach, can we request an ILS approach via radar vectoring?" >> "Delta1022, expect vectors for ILS approach runway 12L." >> And there i go, all handled by ATC. >> In USA, they will always vector you, either visual or ILS, so i only >> have to request ILS once they give me visual approach. >> but in europe, (exclude UK), They mostly want you to fly the STAR, which >> gets resolved by requesting an ILS approach. >> >> The situation that i explained regarding the "proceed direct to XXX" >> mostly applies to one of these: >> 1: After takeoff, instead of doing the SID, ATC tells you to proceed >> direct to <waypoint> >> 2: When approaching, the amount of traffic is very high, thus the ATC >> tries to shape the traffic in his own way so they could be headed for one >> way in approach and not scattered all over the place, so they direct all >> the inbound aircrafts to a cirtain waypoint, then from there, they either >> expect them to do the STAR, or mostly radar vector them for landing. >> >> Strange, i have not seen the let's fly direct to V O R XXX command. is it >> new? I'm sure the VOR navigation commands was first to set the frequency, >> then tune in to the VOR and fly inbound. >> >> >> On 5/22/2014 3:14 AM, Robert Cezar wrote: >> >> Hadi, >> >> If you are going to be flying using VATSIM, and they instruct you to >> descend and maintain FL 240 and proceed direct to V O R, E L W or N D B, X >> X, simply say... >> >> "Descend and maintain flight level 2 4 0". >> "Michelle, let's fly direct to V O R, E L W." >> "Resume GPS navigation". >> >> Michelle will fly to that waypoint. >> >> Then what? >> >> ATC will likely direct you to make the approach via a STAR! Now what? >> >> Please advise. >> >> Robert >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Hadi Rezaei <hadirezaei@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> "Delta1022, descend and maintain flightlevel 240, proceed direct to >>> LHGLUGLHLGUGLHLGULGUGHLGULHGHL" >>> "Center request direct heading to hgluglhlgughlughl?" >>> "Delta1022, turn left heading 240. after ghluglughlulgh cleared >>> flightlevel 100" >>> >>> Um, michel? what do we do now you got any ideas? >>> Michel: "Captain shut up its my plane." >>> But i amm flying online I need to go to manual flying >>> Michel: "It's your fault that you fly online, I will absolutely hold no >>> responsibility for any explosions, damages and crashes to this aircraft >>> once you take controls from me." >>> Right! it's my plane. turn left heading 240, >>> "Center I don't have any ideas about the position of hlughlughlugh >>> waypoint, let me know when i have to descend to fl100" >>> "Delta1022 jees, roger". >>> >>> This is how you fly in online. (JK do not do this in VATSIM, it's very >>> hard~) >>> >>> Anyway, It would be so cool to see/read the waypoints around you and >>> their direct BRG to them, but possibly only for me, You really don't want >>> to mess around like this when you're flying. >>> >>> >>> On 5/22/2014 1:47 AM, Robert Cezar wrote: >>> >>> Regrettably, I see absolutely no need for this facility for BVI pilots. >>> It is entirely a visual paradigm. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Ron Kolesar < >>> kolesar16417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> I think the subject tells it all. >>>> How can you tell if the aircraft you want to fly is equipped with the >>>> Garmin 500 GPS unit? >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ron and current Leader Dog boz who states >>>> "that a service dog beats a cane paws down any day of the week." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> AOPA Member No: 06936977 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> AOPA Member No: 06936977 >> >> >> > > > -- > > > AOPA Member No: 06936977 > > > -- AOPA Member No: 06936977