First, whatever APH and ViewaPlus want to do about view is fine with me. It seems that we are considering four views, a tree view, a browser or htmml view a combined Braille-and-print view and a word processor view. Do we want the last view? Editing can be done in the braille-and-print view. If we don't want a wordprocessor view we con't have to worry about styles, because the layout of the print in the print-Braille view will mimic that of the Braille. Perhaps we should change the architecture to have an org.brailleblaster.views package and within this package subpackages for each view, brailleprintview, treeview, browserview and wordprocessorview. John -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities