[brailleblaster] Re: Some Thoughts

  • From: Alex Jurgensen <asquared21@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:45:52 -0800

Hi John,

The updater code is part of the boot loader. If the boot loader finds an update 
is available, it will present an update option to the user. If the user wishes 
ot continue, it will download and instlal the update. Otherwise, the user can 
continue ot use BB normally.

I hope htat the Java updater project I mentioned before will be completed soon.

Regards,
Alex,


On 2011-02-02, at 9:42 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:

> Alex,
> 
> You must have seen my reply to Chris. I would not want to put a great 
> deal of effort into this approach unless we were pretty certain it would 
> be accessible, but it does sound like a real possibility for killing two 
> birds with one stone.
> 
> I'll be interested in looking at your updater code, but may wait to 
> include something like that.
> 
> By all means find out what the MackApp Store requires.
> 
> The BrailleBlaster website needs updating. I'll try to get around to 
> that soon. The project was started in June 2010. I don't know how we 
> would measure how far along we are. The milestone I am shoting for now 
> is to get at least generic embosser to work. 
> 
> John
> 
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:21:58AM -0800, Alex Jurgensen wrote:
>> Hi John,
>> 
>> I was refering more to Chris' message about using STW's browser control as a 
>> UI. That would get us half way to having a web app, would it not.
>> 
>> Now, that depends on how we end up doing the UI.
>> 
>> About the auto updater, I am working on it because this is where I feel the 
>> most confident, creating a boot loader.
>> 
>> Here is my question.
>> 
>> How far along are we in the 2 year development cycle? The website does not 
>> list a date that the project was started on.
>> 
>> I have also been investigating the rules for submitting the application 
>> through Apple's Mac App Store.
>> 
>> I know it is a little early for this, but I have read about developers who 
>> wrote entire applications that got rejected because of something that was 
>> too difficult to change at the time of submission.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Alex,
>> 
>> 
>> On 2011-02-02, at 9:13 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:
>> 
>>> Alex,
>>> 
>>> Sorry about the need to modify your application bundle, but 
>>> BrailleBlaster has always been written as one word. 
>>> 
>>> I think you are getting ahead of us. It is too early to include 
>>> auto-updatre, and a web application is a whold divverent project. We 
>>> have to stick to what we are doing. After BrailleBlaster is working as a 
>>> desktop  application we can consider a Web application.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:52:17AM -0800, Alex Jurgensen wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I suppose that the Mac issues should be resolved in any case. This would 
>>>> help the Mac community as a whole.
>>>> 
>>>> I've built my boot loader now, but I can't test it yet.
>>>> 
>>>> Did you get a chance to look at my mock up yet?
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think of it?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alex,
>>>> 
>>>> Alex Jurgensen,
>>>> VoiceOver Trainer,
>>>> 
>>>> Visit me on the web at: http://www.vipbc.org/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2011-02-02, at 12:19 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I've read through all these messages, and I'm convinced we should stick 
>>>>> with SWT. By the time BrailleBlaster is ready for use by anybody other 
>>>>> than a developer the problems on the Mac may be resolved. We can add a 
>>>>> little pressure to the Eclipse developers to help things along. The idea 
>>>>> of using the SWT browser to present GUI content is interesting. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The classpaths specified in the ant build.xml file go iknto the manifest 
>>>>> of the BrailleBlaster jar file. This makes callinng BrailleBlaster very 
>>>>> convenient on my flavor of Linux and on Windows. We could make different 
>>>>> versions of BrailleBlaster for different distros, but I think that is 
>>>>> something for the early adapters who use these distros to worry about. 
>>>>> They will know their own flavors. And many of them won't care about the 
>>>>> standard locations.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let's learn from Alex's experience in proting BrailleBlaster to the Mac. 
>>>>> Concern about various Linux flavors at this time is a distraction.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As for me, I'm concentrating on getting BrailleBlaster to work with at 
>>>>> least generic embossers. Then I'll make a simple text editor using a 
>>>>> GUI. the experience in doing this will be necessary to make the real 
>>>>> GUI. The text editor will remain as a BrailleBlaster feature to be used 
>>>>> by advanced users.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Incidentally, BrailleBlaster is a single word.  It should not have a 
>>>>> space.
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
>>>>> Abilitiessoft, Inc.
>>>>> http://www.abilitiessoft.com
>>>>> Madison, Wisconsin USA
>>>>> Developing software for people with disabilities
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- End forwarded message -----
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
>>>>> Abilitiessoft, Inc.
>>>>> http://www.abilitiessoft.com
>>>>> Madison, Wisconsin USA
>>>>> Developing software for people with disabilities
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
>>> Abilitiessoft, Inc.
>>> http://www.abilitiessoft.com
>>> Madison, Wisconsin USA
>>> Developing software for people with disabilities
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
> Abilitiessoft, Inc.
> http://www.abilitiessoft.com
> Madison, Wisconsin USA
> Developing software for people with disabilities
> 
> 


Other related posts: