[bookport] Re: general questions
- From: Pamela Rader <prader@xxxxxxx>
- To: "bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:48:40 -0400
Hi Richard:
First of all, since we've run out of room in the Firmware, NLS was not an
option. Also, we were denied permission to adapt the software to occommodate
the NLS capability, so we were left with no options.
Yes, although both devices were made by the same manufacturer, the 2 devices
look different because although they made the Book Port for us, we designed it,
thus, the keypad and look are different.
Pamela
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Richard Fiorello
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:42 PM
To: bookport
Subject: [bookport] general questions
HI;
The recent discussion leaves me with a few questions. First of all newer
isn't necessarily better so if your current bp does what you want smile and
enjoy.
Secondly, I never totally understood why the bp couldn't be modified to
accommodate nls. From my point of view nls is the primary issue with the
existing bp. I realize that aph has done everything they think they can to
the existing firmware but as long as the firmware can be modified I'm a bit
surprised that some innovative solution isn't out there.
Finally, if springer made both the physical bp and the book courier, why do
the two units look different physically?
Richard
Other related posts:
