[bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
- From: Josh and LuAnn <jkenn337@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:25:15 -0500
How is the quality of the bookport's recording?
Josh
> ----- Original Message -----
>From: David Tanner <david-tanner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:29:37 -0600
>Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
>I would agree with the exception that if if it were possible to increase the
>functionallity, keep all the present features at the level they are at, and
>increase the book reading capabilities without raising the price more than
>$100 to $200 then I think most people would still think they were getting a
>good deal. But, before adding a lot of new features it would be good if a
>few of the current features could be improved a bit. By that I mean, improve
>the notetaking to be able to write in Grade 1, Grade 2, and Computer Braille
>and save the note as a BRF file. Be able to edit a BRF file in the notetaker,
>improve the voice recorder so that it really could be used by a student or
>professional to record a class or a meeting without having to also invest in a
>digital recorder such as the Olympus DS2, put a small speaker on board (I
>don't care how small that speaker is but let me have one without having to dig
>around to find an external speaker), and add an easy to use way with
i
> n BookPort Exchange to backup the entire unit and be able to restore it in
> case of a crash; this one needs to be easy enough for a non-technical person
> to be able to do it and be successful every time they go thru the process.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Shannon A. Reece" <shazza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:47 PM
>Subject: [bookport] Re: bookport suggestion
>: Unless adding it or any other things people want raises the price of the
>: unit.
>: From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>: > That idea that features are only good if they support reading books is why
>: > technology is being held back. If the calculator in no way damages how
>: well
>: > the bookport can read a book, and it doesn't tax the current
>: hard/firmware,
>: > then thehre's no good reason not to add it.
>:
>:
>:
Other related posts:
