[bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- From: Peter Rand <peter.rand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:35:05 +0100
Thanks Jerry,
I thoroughly enjoyed reading your informative contribution about
relative battery characteristics.
I've been using rechargeable batteries for years without any problems.
Peter
Jerry Neufeld wrote:
>Good morning folks.
>
>Although I am certainly no electronics engineer, some rather straight
>forward facts about batteries may help to clear up some of the confusion
>that seems to persist about potential harm from non-alkaline batteries.
>
>.... (text omitted)
>
>Sorry it took so long to say all of this. Hopefully, some of what I said
>will clear up some misapprehensions about potential damage from non-alkaline
>batteries.
>
>All the best,
>
>Jerry
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
- » [bookport] battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable