[bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable

  • From: "Walt Smith" <walt@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:27:22 -0500

We all knew that, but your original message clearly linked the use of 
rechargeable batteries with the failure you experienced and this simply 
makes no sense. As long as the battery voltage is what's needed (and by 
using double A batteries of any type, you ensure that it is), there can't be 
any connection whatever.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kurt E. Yount" <blsmass@xxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:27 AM
Subject: [bookport] battery life, alkaline versus rechargable


The rechargable batteries tend to last a shorter amount of time causing
you to have to change them more frequently.  I did have to change them
more frequently but always carried extras and didn't worry about it till
the thing stopped working.  Alkaline batteries tend to give a longer
smoother battery life, but I always figured it didn't matter, until I had
to send it off and will have to wait four to six weeks to git it fixed.
Kurt

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. bookport
  3. Archive
  4. 12-2004