[bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- From: Will Smith <wilsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 16:31:39 -0500 (EST)
Indeed so. I have become a big fan of NIMH batteries. They can often
last for many hundreds of rechargings and I've never lost any gadgets
powered by them.
One can save a big chunk of change, particularly using a set of NIMH
batteries with the appropriate re-charging setup.
Will
wilsmith@xxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Peter Rand wrote:
> Thanks Jerry,
>
> I thoroughly enjoyed reading your informative contribution about
> relative battery characteristics.
Other related posts:
- » [bookport] battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable
- » [bookport] Re: battery life, alkaline versus rechargable