After seeing all the negative response to this idea, we are thinking of warning you that we cannot tell if the flash card is free from errors and that we recommend you check the card yourself. We will then offer to let you proceed if you wish. Of course if you are using XP and have admin rights, we will correct errors on the card then proceed with the update. >>> ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:11:21 PM >>> Larry, given your reasoning below, I for one would like to go with your proposal requiring the user to have administrative privileges. The only problem I see is that one or more people on the list might not have privileges. Then, I suppose, they could get the person who does have those privileges to accomplish the update. Neal -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of LARRY SKUTCHAN Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:49 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Why Administrator? The reason we are considering requiring administrative rights before applying a firmware update is that we want to check and/or fix errors on the flash card before applying the firmware update. If you do not have admin rights, you cannot run chkdsk, and we cannot run the automated version of this tool to correct errors. Now, if you are saying, that you do not care to check for errors before applying the update and you know the update could damage the device if there are errors on the card, and you would have to send it back in, that is fine. We just assumed that you would prefer to check the media for damages, correct those errors, then apply the update on a known good structure even at the cost of the inconvenience of logging in as an administrator. The fact is that you need to check the flash card for errors, and we can do that for you. Even if you want to do it yourself though, you will need to have admin rights.