I agree, Sandy. I've always used Precise Pete because it's the brightest sounding of the voices. By brightest, I mean the one with the most treble. Generally speaking, I find the brighter the tone or frequency response is, the more intelligible the speech is. Or maybe it's just that I'm in my fifties and my ears are going. <grin> Lou ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandy Licht" <slicht@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:17 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: New Beta Available > I haven't noticed any change with Precise Pete or Perfect Paul.At 03:33 PM > 3/15/2005, you wrote: > >Apparently, not in some circles, Dave. The Good old BNS had adjustments for > >both pitch and frequency. They both made a difference although I'd be hard > >pressed to define it. I must also say that I never spent much time > >exploring it once I found satisfactory settings for both. Lou > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "David Allen" <wd8ldy@xxxxxxxxxx> > >To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:04 PM > >Subject: [bookport] Re: New Beta Available > > > > > > > Hi Clarence and list: > > > > > > Pitch is frequency, is it not? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dave > > > > > Sandy Licht > Phone: 409-898-8218 > Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A > 11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They > are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope. > 12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in earnest, > you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says the > LORD... > >