Sugar and peanut butter will make a cookie all right. But it helps to
have a binder to keep them from crumbling. My One One One recipe
calls for 1 egg; 1 cup sugar; 1 cup peanut butter. I blend the egg
and the sugar together and then fold in the peanut butter.
Baking temperature is at a very low setting. I heat the oven to about
250 degrees and put teaspoon size globs on the greased cookie sheet,
usually pressing them down a little. Cook them for about 15 to 20
minutes.
I test them by tapping the cookie with my finger. If it's fairly
firm, they are done.
Since there is no flour in the mixture, we are actually melting the
ingredients together rather than baking them. No salt, no baking soda
and no flour.
And the easy thing is, you can increase the recipe as many times as you wish.
I like them just the way they are, but Cathy says they're too sweet for her.
Next time I make them I think I'll try mixing in some oatmeal and
raisins. And maybe some chopped walnuts.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/10/17, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote:
How about this for a really simple peanut butter cooky. Mix equal parts
peanut butter and sugar thoroughly. Then mash out gobs of it flat on a
cooky sheet. I forget what temperature your oven should be heated to,
but 350 should do just fine. Bake for ten minutes. The results are
still a bit squishy, but let them cool and they harden into cookies.
On 11/10/2017 4:36 PM, Carl Jarvis wrote:
Well, I do really try to send the message that I don't care what
people believe, as far as religion goes. But that is because at the
same time I find myself saying that All religion is at the bottom of
our human troubles. So I can refrain...a little, but Mostafa does
crank my chain, and I go rumbling off with my cannons of Peace,
blazing. Still, if we adopt your approach to religious discussion,
and apply it to other beliefs, we will wind up exchanging recipes and
valentines. Which might not be such a bad thing. Did I ever tell you
how to make the most simplest of all cookies? The One One One Cookie.
When I taught food service in the BEP, it was the first item my
students learned how to make.
We sold them in the cafeteria, two for a dime, and soon we had to
expand the One One One Cookie to a Four Four Four Cookie, in order to
make enough to meet the demand.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/10/17, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You know, the religious arguing on this list is an example of what is
happening all over the world. There are various religious sects fighting
each other, like different kinds of Muslims, fighting each other. Then
we
have people damning all Muslims and insisting that Christianity is
superior
to Islam, that Islam is more violent than Christianity. And we've had
anti-Semitism for as long as the Jewish religion has existed, it seems.
And
there have been conflicts among the various branches of Judaism. And, of
course, there are conflicts among the various branches of Christianity
also.
I've talked to Evangelical Christians who believe that their brand of
Christianity is the only true Christianity. And weren't there wars over
whether or not the Catholic Church should be dominant in various
European
countries? There was the Reformation. And now we have the New Atheists
who
differ from old fashioned atheists in that they are as missionary minded
as
Mustafa.
Couldn't we please just stop having this same old tired debate on this
list.
Can't everybody just believe what he or she wishes to believe without
attempting to impose those beliefs, whether they be Muslim, Christian,
Agnostic, or Atheist, on everybody else?
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 10:52 AM
To: blind-democracy <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bob Evans <ebob824@xxxxxxxxx>; Mostafa <mostafa.almahdy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Americanisation fragile
, as I've said before, you are a carbon copy of the Christian fanatic,
only
you put Allah's banner on the top of your flag pole in place of the
Cross.
You wrote, "Allah blessed you
with numerous bounties to test whether you will be grateful or
ungrateful.
This is His divine statute, glory be to Him."
And what about those several millions of Indigenous People already
caring
for this bountiful land? Are you suggesting that Allah is prejudiced
against the American Indian? Did Allah "allow" White Europeans to
enslave
Black Africans because the Europeans needed to learn how to play nice to
Blacks? Or had those bad Africans earned the enslavement that crushed
them
for hundreds of years? Allah, may He rest in peace, and God, let Him
rest
eternally, are simply Make Believe Genies. They may be called on as
friendly Genies if times are good, and they can be sent back into their
lantern when times are bad.
That makes more sense than pretending that Allah and God are allowing
one
people to crush another in order to "allow" them an opportunity to test
their gratitude." Huh??? Say that again? This is exactly the same
babble
that the Southern Radio Evangelist shouts to his devoted Jesus Lovers.
If God and Allah are the best Gods we can dream up, what more proof do
you
need to demonstrate that both come from within Man's limited Dream
World?
Carl Jarvis
On 11/9/17, Bob <ebob824@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The United States is a prominently spacious territory. It is close
to be a
continent. It is known for its unevidently tautened principles of
democracy, justice and equality. However, these values are
intemperately sniped with bigotry, xenophobia, racial segregation,
pride, hate incitement, derision and mass impudence. Americans often
have these concepts
mixed up. Free speech and hate rhetoric, the right to bear arms and
gun violence, liberty and travesty, pride and dignity. Politics torn
your nation
apart. Therefore, your imperial era is about to diminish. Allah
blessed you
with numerous bounties to test whether you will be grateful or
ungrateful.
This is His divine statute, glory be to Him. What brought Donald Trump
to oval office? Despite what was being said about Russian meddling in
past elections, Allah is willing to providentially penalise
wrongdoers. Donald Trump is obviously rapscallion, racialist, bigoted,
unreliable, unconscionable, propagandist, dishonourable, misanthrope,
prurient, flamboyant, aweless and dissembler. He won against his
rivals with exercising fallacious rhetoric. He abhorrently dissed each
and everyone. He
despicably affronted politicians, journalists and public figures. We
heard his emphatically offensive remarks against many people. This is
why educated
Americans are so upset. They are taken aback of this unpresidential
character to be elected. This is the divine manner. Allah says in the
Koran
what could be meaningly rendered as namely. And when We would destroy
a township, We send commandment to its folk who live at ease, and
afterward they commit abomination therein, and so the Word of doom
hath effect for it,
and we annihilate it with complete annihilation. This is a commentary
based
translation of verse sixteen in chapter seventeen. This verse matches
your
election conclusion in unrivalled precision. Donald Trump is
enormously affluent and thence, he is eligible to lead a nation that
is based on capitalistic tenets. He is deficient of basic adequacy to
manage a nursery or a small shop. His character matches what I call
typical nescience in imbecility. What arrogance does? Arrogance makes
its bearer blinded to see the truth. When you speak disparagingly of
other traditions, this is the beginning of your end. America’s
reputable status is on its edge to collapse. You may respectfully
disagree with other people. However, it certainly becomes a problem
when this disagreement turns into unsolicited conflict. You may
criticise others or even debate their views on particular
issues. Withal, it is a trouble if you desperately demand to
intolerantly demonise others to relentlessly justify your hostile
stance. Why don’t you folks learn from Canada? Canada is notably
recognised for its distinctive factors of practically promoting
diversity and multiculturalism. What is multiculturalism in Canada? It
is the doctrine that several different cultures rather than one can
coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country. So, you could
commonly encounter bits and bobs of everything. You don’t have to
forcefully be painted with certain colour to be welcomed there. This
is the plain difference between Canada and the States. In the States,
you have got to be Americanised in some form or another to be
accepted. This is what I call, the dominating disease of racism.
Abraham Lincoln emancipated slaves but unfortunately, he treated the
symptom and disposed the disease. Slavery was the symptom but racial
disparity is actually the disease. I will always repeat this
assertion, racism has to be
portrayed as a deadly sinful act. Otherwise, change won’t occur
anytime soon. As for the recently aggrieved mass shooting of Texas,
controversial arguments about gun control rose again. Why many
members of the National Rifle Association act carelessly about gun
safety and regulation? Despite the recurrence of fatal mass shootings
in various places, American legislative committees decline to
significantly straighten the situation out. People aren't safe at
Churches, concerts, malls, medical centres, campuses or school
complex. Trump said in multiple occasions that he take cares of all
Americans. Subsequent to New York's truck callous assault, he called
for more intense procedures and extremely enforced vetting to insure
potential terrorists aren't issued visas. However, he nearly acted
heedlessly concerning the massive shooting incident in Texas. Isn't
that a clear sign of double standard? This is the relentless prob I
have been encountering with your justice system for consecutive
decades. I knew for certain, many sensible and just Americans aren't
so pleased with what is happening in their country. Americans became
numb
to such incidents.
Terrorism in their minds is only affiliated with Muslims. They aren't
stringent in their assessment. This is why I am often tempestuous with
American set of standards. This disposal of practicing double standard
is immensely prevalent. Whenever a white guy commits mass murder, he
is incessantly labelled as mentally imbalanced. However, if a Muslim
committed
that crime, he would have been instantly classified as a dire Muslim
radical
and the incident would have been considered an act of terror. The
portrait is now clearer than ever before. The question is, for how
long will we lie to ourselves? It is distinctly plain that we aren't
equal in their minds to
the white citizen who happend to be born there. Despite their
insistence to
deny this conclusion, evidence for it are gigantically triumphal. I do
not destine to unfairly extrapolate. I just desire to seek equatable
justice. I
attentively followed a three hours live coverage of the incident on
Youtube.
I think it was published by ABC Radio. The show host spoke reasonably
and his remote guests were competently sane in their discussion. That
is one of
the reasons why I believe sensible Americans out there aren't
generically satisfied with the current situation. The problem will
firmly be fixed if we
redressed what is in my so humble opinion, a grave misinterpretation
of the
second amendment. I rendered my entailment on its essence previously.
I won't ingeminate this for now. I did not take the literal meaning of
the text. I rather went deeper to the legal spirit of the statute to
properly derive consistent discernment. It needs to be reviewed with
further accuracy, accountability and unprejudiced temperament. Thank
you so much for
loyally reading this piece. I keenly look forward to hearing from you.
Bob
