Here's a really simple recipe for you. Put a can of sardines packed with
mustard sauce through a blender with vanilla ice cream. Yum. A sardine
milkshake!
On 11/11/2017 6:06 PM, Miriam Vieni wrote:
I'd like them just fine if you could find a substitute for the peanut butter.
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl Jarvis
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 2:47 PM
To: Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx>
Cc: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Americanisation fragile
Sugar and peanut butter will make a cookie all right. But it helps to have a
binder to keep them from crumbling. My One One One recipe calls for 1 egg; 1
cup sugar; 1 cup peanut butter. I blend the egg and the sugar together and
then fold in the peanut butter.
Baking temperature is at a very low setting. I heat the oven to about
250 degrees and put teaspoon size globs on the greased cookie sheet, usually
pressing them down a little. Cook them for about 15 to 20 minutes.
I test them by tapping the cookie with my finger. If it's fairly firm, they
are done.
Since there is no flour in the mixture, we are actually melting the ingredients
together rather than baking them. No salt, no baking soda and no flour.
And the easy thing is, you can increase the recipe as many times as you wish.
I like them just the way they are, but Cathy says they're too sweet for her.
Next time I make them I think I'll try mixing in some oatmeal and raisins. And
maybe some chopped walnuts.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/10/17, Roger Loran Bailey <rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx> wrote:
How about this for a really simple peanut butter cooky. Mix equal
parts peanut butter and sugar thoroughly. Then mash out gobs of it
flat on a cooky sheet. I forget what temperature your oven should be
heated to, but 350 should do just fine. Bake for ten minutes. The
results are still a bit squishy, but let them cool and they harden into cookies.
On 11/10/2017 4:36 PM, Carl Jarvis wrote:
Well, I do really try to send the message that I don't care what
people believe, as far as religion goes. But that is because at the
same time I find myself saying that All religion is at the bottom of
our human troubles. So I can refrain...a little, but Mostafa does
crank my chain, and I go rumbling off with my cannons of Peace,
blazing. Still, if we adopt your approach to religious discussion,
and apply it to other beliefs, we will wind up exchanging recipes and
valentines. Which might not be such a bad thing. Did I ever tell
you how to make the most simplest of all cookies? The One One One Cookie.
When I taught food service in the BEP, it was the first item my
students learned how to make.
We sold them in the cafeteria, two for a dime, and soon we had to
expand the One One One Cookie to a Four Four Four Cookie, in order to
make enough to meet the demand.
Carl Jarvis
On 11/10/17, Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You know, the religious arguing on this list is an example of what
is happening all over the world. There are various religious sects
fighting each other, like different kinds of Muslims, fighting each
other. Then we have people damning all Muslims and insisting that
Christianity is superior to Islam, that Islam is more violent than
Christianity. And we've had anti-Semitism for as long as the Jewish
religion has existed, it seems.
And
there have been conflicts among the various branches of Judaism.
And, of course, there are conflicts among the various branches of
Christianity also.
I've talked to Evangelical Christians who believe that their brand
of Christianity is the only true Christianity. And weren't there
wars over whether or not the Catholic Church should be dominant in
various European countries? There was the Reformation. And now we
have the New Atheists who differ from old fashioned atheists in that
they are as missionary minded as Mustafa.
Couldn't we please just stop having this same old tired debate on
this list.
Can't everybody just believe what he or she wishes to believe
without attempting to impose those beliefs, whether they be Muslim,
Christian, Agnostic, or Atheist, on everybody else?
Miriam
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carl
Jarvis
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 10:52 AM
To: blind-democracy <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bob Evans <ebob824@xxxxxxxxx>; Mostafa
<mostafa.almahdy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [blind-democracy] Re: Americanisation fragile
, as I've said before, you are a carbon copy of the Christian
fanatic, only you put Allah's banner on the top of your flag pole in
place of the Cross.
You wrote, "Allah blessed you
with numerous bounties to test whether you will be grateful or
ungrateful.
This is His divine statute, glory be to Him."
And what about those several millions of Indigenous People already
caring for this bountiful land? Are you suggesting that Allah is
prejudiced against the American Indian? Did Allah "allow" White
Europeans to enslave Black Africans because the Europeans needed to
learn how to play nice to Blacks? Or had those bad Africans earned
the enslavement that crushed them for hundreds of years? Allah, may
He rest in peace, and God, let Him rest eternally, are simply Make
Believe Genies. They may be called on as friendly Genies if times
are good, and they can be sent back into their lantern when times
are bad.
That makes more sense than pretending that Allah and God are
allowing one people to crush another in order to "allow" them an
opportunity to test their gratitude." Huh??? Say that again? This
is exactly the same babble that the Southern Radio Evangelist shouts
to his devoted Jesus Lovers.
If God and Allah are the best Gods we can dream up, what more proof
do you need to demonstrate that both come from within Man's limited
Dream World?
Carl Jarvis
On 11/9/17, Bob <ebob824@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The United States is a prominently spacious territory. It is
close to be a
continent. It is known for its unevidently tautened principles of
democracy, justice and equality. However, these values are
intemperately sniped with bigotry, xenophobia, racial segregation,
pride, hate incitement, derision and mass impudence. Americans
often have these concepts
mixed up. Free speech and hate rhetoric, the right to bear arms and
gun violence, liberty and travesty, pride and dignity. Politics
torn your nation
apart. Therefore, your imperial era is about to diminish. Allah
blessed you
with numerous bounties to test whether you will be grateful or
ungrateful.
This is His divine statute, glory be to Him. What brought Donald
Trump to oval office? Despite what was being said about Russian
meddling in past elections, Allah is willing to providentially
penalise wrongdoers. Donald Trump is obviously rapscallion,
racialist, bigoted, unreliable, unconscionable, propagandist,
dishonourable, misanthrope, prurient, flamboyant, aweless and
dissembler. He won against his rivals with exercising fallacious
rhetoric. He abhorrently dissed each and everyone. He
despicably affronted politicians, journalists and public figures.
We heard his emphatically offensive remarks against many people.
This is why educated
Americans are so upset. They are taken aback of this unpresidential
character to be elected. This is the divine manner. Allah says in
the Koran
what could be meaningly rendered as namely. And when We would
destroy a township, We send commandment to its folk who live at
ease, and afterward they commit abomination therein, and so the
Word of doom hath effect for it,
and we annihilate it with complete annihilation. This is a
commentary based
translation of verse sixteen in chapter seventeen. This verse
matches your
election conclusion in unrivalled precision. Donald Trump is
enormously affluent and thence, he is eligible to lead a nation
that is based on capitalistic tenets. He is deficient of basic
adequacy to manage a nursery or a small shop. His character matches
what I call typical nescience in imbecility. What arrogance does?
Arrogance makes its bearer blinded to see the truth. When you speak
disparagingly of other traditions, this is the beginning of your
end. America’s reputable status is on its edge to collapse. You
may respectfully disagree with other people. However, it certainly
becomes a problem when this disagreement turns into unsolicited
conflict. You may criticise others or even debate their views on
particular
issues. Withal, it is a trouble if you desperately demand to
intolerantly demonise others to relentlessly justify your hostile
stance. Why don’t you folks learn from Canada? Canada is notably
recognised for its distinctive factors of practically promoting
diversity and multiculturalism. What is multiculturalism in Canada?
It is the doctrine that several different cultures rather than one
can coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country. So, you
could commonly encounter bits and bobs of everything. You don’t
have to forcefully be painted with certain colour to be welcomed
there. This is the plain difference between Canada and the States.
In the States, you have got to be Americanised in some form or
another to be accepted. This is what I call, the dominating disease of racism.
Abraham Lincoln emancipated slaves but unfortunately, he treated
the symptom and disposed the disease. Slavery was the symptom but
racial disparity is actually the disease. I will always repeat this
assertion, racism has to be
portrayed as a deadly sinful act. Otherwise, change won’t occur
anytime soon. As for the recently aggrieved mass shooting of Texas,
controversial arguments about gun control rose again. Why many
members of the National Rifle Association act carelessly about gun
safety and regulation? Despite the recurrence of fatal mass
shootings in various places, American legislative committees
decline to significantly straighten the situation out. People
aren't safe at Churches, concerts, malls, medical centres, campuses
or school complex. Trump said in multiple occasions that he take
cares of all Americans. Subsequent to New York's truck callous
assault, he called for more intense procedures and extremely
enforced vetting to insure
potential terrorists aren't issued visas. However, he nearly acted
heedlessly concerning the massive shooting incident in Texas. Isn't
that a clear sign of double standard? This is the relentless prob I
have been encountering with your justice system for consecutive
decades. I knew for certain, many sensible and just Americans
aren't so pleased with what is happening in their country.
Americans became numb to such incidents.
Terrorism in their minds is only affiliated with Muslims. They
aren't stringent in their assessment. This is why I am often
tempestuous with American set of standards. This disposal of
practicing double standard is immensely prevalent. Whenever a white
guy commits mass murder, he is incessantly labelled as mentally
imbalanced. However, if a Muslim committed
that crime, he would have been instantly classified as a dire
Muslim radical
and the incident would have been considered an act of terror. The
portrait is now clearer than ever before. The question is, for how
long will we lie to ourselves? It is distinctly plain that we
aren't equal in their minds to
the white citizen who happend to be born there. Despite their
insistence to
deny this conclusion, evidence for it are gigantically triumphal. I
do not destine to unfairly extrapolate. I just desire to seek
equatable justice. I
attentively followed a three hours live coverage of the incident on
Youtube.
I think it was published by ABC Radio. The show host spoke
reasonably and his remote guests were competently sane in their
discussion. That is one of
the reasons why I believe sensible Americans out there aren't
generically satisfied with the current situation. The problem will
firmly be fixed if we
redressed what is in my so humble opinion, a grave
misinterpretation of the
second amendment. I rendered my entailment on its essence previously.
I won't ingeminate this for now. I did not take the literal meaning
of the text. I rather went deeper to the legal spirit of the
statute to properly derive consistent discernment. It needs to be
reviewed with further accuracy, accountability and unprejudiced
temperament. Thank you so much for
loyally reading this piece. I keenly look forward to hearing from you.
Bob
