Now this is a wonderful idea. Why didn't I think of that? (smile) -- Rui Bookshare.org Unofficial Volunteer Scanning Page http://members.cox.net/booksharescans ----- Original Message ----- From: "Louise" <lougou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 12:01 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page > I also think there should be two separate lists, one for those books which > have never been validated and one for those books that were bounced back for > different reasons such as checking for page breaks, fair rating status, etc. > This might make it less confusing for everyone instead of having everything > lumped together. Just my two cents' worth! > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mike Pietruk" <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:48 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: returned to step one page > > > > Tif > > > > There is something else that bothers me about these bounce backs. The way > > this is done, unless one happens to check to see if their work bounces > > back, one would be clueless that this has occurred. > > Might it be possible that the system be set up so that any action taken by > > someone to > > a book generate an automated email both to the submitter and the latest > > validator? > > Right now, as I see it, the weak link in the BookShare system is the > > validation pool where books often books sit seemingly forever; and part of > > the reason may include just the kind of situation you stumbled upon. > > I recently stumbled upon a validation of mine that had a similar fate, > > resubmitted it from my hd, including the requested info. > > So far, while it hasn't yet made the collection, it hasn't bounced back > > either so I am keeping my fingers crossed that all is well with this book. > > > > > > > > > > >