[bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:22:43 -0500
Cindy dear,
What you are forgetting is that when a book is put back on Step 1, the
original submission is put back. Rose would need to go through Gustavo like
you did after I rejected that book. I grabbed it because I remembered you
were working on it and since it is so popular I was afraid someone else,
not knowing you were validating it, would pick it up and validate. You
should be hearing from Gustavo about your book. He promised. <smile>
Regards,
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:28 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating
Hmmmm. Am I wrong in thinking that after a person
rejects a book because of its condition, neither that
person nor anyone else can re-scan it and submit it?
My idea was that Rose reject it because of its
condition -- unless someone else is willing to tackle
it from the beginning, in its original shape. Then, it
could be re-scanned and submitted, by the original
submitter or someone else -- or Rose could submit her
worked-on copy. In the latter case it would onto the
download list and be validated, hopefully.
Cindy
--- Jake Brownell <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Cindy,
> Rose did not actually scan the book and so
> submitting it would be a bit
> off the norm. As well despite how much time someone
> spends on a book, we as
> validators cannot decide where credit is and is not
> due. As well for
> tracking purposes in case of future inqueries or
> problems the BookShare
> system needs to show the correct originating
> submitters information. When
> submitting we represent that we in fact were the
> initial source of the book.
> This is of course why BookShare prefers that only
> one person work on a book
> before submitting and that the work is not divided
> between volunteers.
>
> HTH,
> Jake
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:12 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're
> validating
>
>
> > True, Kellie, but if the book is in as bad
> condition
> > as it seems to be from the fact that Rose spent
> hours
> > and hours fixing it, the submitter doesn't deserve
> the
> > credit. I haven't downloaded it to see--maybe I'm
> > misunderstanding how long Rose spent fixing it
> before
> > she tried to upload it.
> >
> > The only other solution to getting it into the
> > collection, and it seems as if it would be of
> value to
> > medical workers, is for the submitter to validate
> and
> > upload it him/her self.
> >
> > Cindy
> >
> >
> > --- Kellie Hartmann <hart0421@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Cindy,
> > > It wouldn't work for Rose to resubmit in the way
> > > you're suggesting--that
> > > would deny the submission credit to the original
> > > submitter.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.0/50 -
> Release Date: 7/16/2005
> >
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
Other related posts:
