Hi Cindy, Rose did not actually scan the book and so submitting it would be a bit off the norm. As well despite how much time someone spends on a book, we as validators cannot decide where credit is and is not due. As well for tracking purposes in case of future inqueries or problems the BookShare system needs to show the correct originating submitters information. When submitting we represent that we in fact were the initial source of the book. This is of course why BookShare prefers that only one person work on a book before submitting and that the work is not divided between volunteers. HTH, Jake ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:12 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating > True, Kellie, but if the book is in as bad condition > as it seems to be from the fact that Rose spent hours > and hours fixing it, the submitter doesn't deserve the > credit. I haven't downloaded it to see--maybe I'm > misunderstanding how long Rose spent fixing it before > she tried to upload it. > > The only other solution to getting it into the > collection, and it seems as if it would be of value to > medical workers, is for the submitter to validate and > upload it him/her self. > > Cindy > > > --- Kellie Hartmann <hart0421@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Cindy, > > It wouldn't work for Rose to resubmit in the way > > you're suggesting--that > > would deny the submission credit to the original > > submitter. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.0/50 - Release Date: 7/16/2005 > >