[bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're validating
- From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, Sue.
I still haven't heard from Gustavo. He must have had a
busy Monday, maybe approving moe books. (smile). I'll
check the collection--maybe Cloudy Jewel is in it
today.
Cindy
-- siss52 <siss52@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cindy dear,
>
> What you are forgetting is that when a book is put
> back on Step 1, the
> original submission is put back. Rose would need to
> go through Gustavo like
> you did after I rejected that book. I grabbed it
> because I remembered you
> were working on it and since it is so popular I was
> afraid someone else,
> not knowing you were validating it, would pick it up
> and validate. You
> should be hearing from Gustavo about your book. He
> promised. <smile>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sue S.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:28 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books you're
> validating
>
>
> Hmmmm. Am I wrong in thinking that after a person
> rejects a book because of its condition, neither
> that
> person nor anyone else can re-scan it and submit it?
> My idea was that Rose reject it because of its
> condition -- unless someone else is willing to
> tackle
> it from the beginning, in its original shape. Then,
> it
> could be re-scanned and submitted, by the original
> submitter or someone else -- or Rose could submit
> her
> worked-on copy. In the latter case it would onto the
> download list and be validated, hopefully.
>
> Cindy
>
>
> --- Jake Brownell <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Cindy,
> > Rose did not actually scan the book and so
> > submitting it would be a bit
> > off the norm. As well despite how much time
> someone
> > spends on a book, we as
> > validators cannot decide where credit is and is
> not
> > due. As well for
> > tracking purposes in case of future inqueries or
> > problems the BookShare
> > system needs to show the correct originating
> > submitters information. When
> > submitting we represent that we in fact were the
> > initial source of the book.
> > This is of course why BookShare prefers that only
> > one person work on a book
> > before submitting and that the work is not divided
> > between volunteers.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Jake
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cindy" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 2:12 PM
> > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: renewing books
> you're
> > validating
> >
> >
> > > True, Kellie, but if the book is in as bad
> > condition
> > > as it seems to be from the fact that Rose spent
> > hours
> > > and hours fixing it, the submitter doesn't
> deserve
> > the
> > > credit. I haven't downloaded it to see--maybe
> I'm
> > > misunderstanding how long Rose spent fixing it
> > before
> > > she tried to upload it.
> > >
> > > The only other solution to getting it into the
> > > collection, and it seems as if it would be of
> > value to
> > > medical workers, is for the submitter to
> validate
> > and
> > > upload it him/her self.
> > >
> > > Cindy
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Kellie Hartmann <hart0421@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Cindy,
> > > > It wouldn't work for Rose to resubmit in the
> way
> > > > you're suggesting--that
> > > > would deny the submission credit to the
> original
> > > > submitter.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.0/50 -
> > Release Date: 7/16/2005
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail
> Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the
> tour:
> http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
