I would try emailing Carrie. I bet she'd be able to take them off for you. Melissa gwen tweedy wrote:
That makes sense on the first question Thanks.I guess I just wish there were a way when you goof up and you know your scans most likely won't make it if there would be a way you could reject them yourself, clear your books so you could have a clean slate.Thanks Gwen----- Original Message ----- *From:* EVAN REESE <mailto:mentat3@xxxxxxxxxxx> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:13 AM *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Re: questions please and thank you delete if don't like how I write. Hi Gwen,As to the first question, it used to be that scanners couldproofread, (validate), as it used to be called), their own works. However, that was changed because having a different proofreader can find mistakes that the original scanner missed. Seeing with fresh eyes, in a manner of speaking. I know that I have made mistakes in books I submitted that were caught by the proofreader, so I think this is a good system.Not sure I understand your second question, though. Evan----- Original Message ----- *From:* gwen tweedy <mailto:gstweedy@xxxxxxx> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2009 9:46 AM *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] questions please and thank you delete if don't like how I write. I'm wondering if there are people who have no trouble submitting books their books are always excepted no matter what. Why couldn't they be allowed to scan and proof their own books if they so desired? Question 2: Why can't a scanner at least be allowed to clear their book lists so they can start over with no books pending? Thanks Gwen
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.