[bksvol-discuss] Re: Wish list books.

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Judy <cherryjam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:48:54 -0500

I think the problem is that they are in house scans and are raw scans.

___

Sam Harris
“ I know of no society in human history that ever suffered because its people 
became too desirous of evidence in support of their core beliefs. ”
― Sam Harris,

On 1/20/2020 4:52 PM, Judy wrote:

Hi Tomoko,

Some of the wish list books are coming through with awful quality. Reject them. It isn't a proofreader's job to fix an awful scan like the one you are describing.

When you reject the book, make sure you check "other" and leave a comment on the field that lets you do that, explaining why you rejected it. The little codes that you check on that page don't seem to work, but leaving a comment does.

Judy

On January 20, 2020 2:05:21 PM CST, Tomoko Miles <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Recently, I had proofread some “wish list books”. Some of them are
    too many misspellings. An example is that a book I had corrected
    thousands and thousands misspellings and uploaded. Then, the book
    which was returned the proofreading lists. You might say spelling
    correction is a proofreader’s job. However, they are too much.
    Other than misspellings, I think some “wish list books” are “poor
    quality”, such as font problem or ... problems. I’m wondering what
    a submitter’s job is. Can a submitter submit a “poor quality”
    book? In addition, Amanda hadn’t reply soon. I had to wait at
    least two weeks.

    Don't you have the same kind of problem? How do you think?

    Tomoko

Other related posts: