I understand completely I was in a rush when I wrote that first message and very frustrated at how badly that book came out when I looked at my results. Also, I was afraid that my scanner was having problems.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Monica Willyard" <rhyami@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 8:07 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Coulter
Hi, Gary. I'm so relieved! I had this horrible, sinking worry that somehow I'd royally messed up the version that's in the collection. It did have some things that needed to be fixed when I validated it, but it was a very nice scan too. Validating isn't my strong suit, as I prefer to scan. I validate books because it needs to be done, but I always worry that I've missed something that someone will be sure to notice. Monica Willyard Gary Petraccaro wrote:I just reread my first message and owe Shelley an appology for it's poor phrasing. What I meant to be understood as saying was that I just took a look at the latest Coulter which my library just lent me. I had requested it some 4 months previous. I scanned it for amusement and got the results I sited--no page better than 99.6, and most around 99 in terms of accuracy. I then looked at the rating Shelley's version had and it said excellent. My message was a request for the settings she had used to obtain her results. I sincerely hope this clears things up. Btw, when all was said and done, I had 257 words as flagged by rank spelling when capitals were excluded.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.10/1241 - Release Date: 1/24/2008 9:58 AM
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
