[AZ-Observing] Re: Illuminated Billboards
- From: <beevo1@xxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:33:52 -0500
Well I did have an urge to put my sunglasses on when I drove by at 1am
And if you think that's bad, when you drive west on I10 just past the 101
Interchange in Avondale you can see a shadow of your car if you look to the
right. It's cast bythe dealership lights....
Beevo
K7BVO
---- "Wayne (aka Mr. Galaxy)" <mrgalaxy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
=============
Benson, AZ 85602
hm ph: 520-586-2244 You mean you're getting a SunTan on the SanTan! Was that
SPF 202 you were using? Sorry, couldn't resist...
Clear skies,
Wayne (aka Mr. Galaxy)
---------- Original Message ----------
From: <beevo1@xxxxxxx>
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Illuminated Billboards
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:46:34 -0500
My biggest question is why the light output can't be reduced after sundown? I
drive by the light dealer signs on the 202 SanTan and could read a newspaper
inside my car if Iweren't driving....
Beevo
K7BVO
---- Dan Heim <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
============What a coincidence. My Sky Lights blog post this Monday was on
exactly
this topic. See: http://heimhenge.com/skylights
Stan makes exactly the same point I did. Even if they were forced to go
to a static image, or one that rotates daily (changing at, say, 3 am so
NOT to distract drivers), they still put out a lot of light above the
horizontal ... and that's the real issue for astronomy. These signs
can't be "shielded" like a properly built conventional billboard with
downward-pointing top-mounted lights. Of course, very few conventional
billboards are constructed that way, as it's cheaper to replace bulbs
mounted at the bottom.
Dan Heim
On 11/18/2011 8:08 AM, Stan Gorodenski wrote:
> I just read the court of appeals has ruled the illuminated billboards
> are illegal because they are intermittent lighting. Even if this
> decision holds, it seems to me all they have to do is revert back to
> one constant displayed image and they would still be polluting the night
> skies.
> Stan
> --
> See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
> send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
