You know, even if you DO know which is more reasonable and has more supporting evidence, I don't agree with the chart. I think there's room in a discussion to say, "that's reasonable, but I have a sense that it's wrong anyway." rwl On 29/04/2011, at 10:25 AM, Howard Silcock wrote: > Don't you love how rationalists are so blind to their own prejudices? "The > position that is more reasonable and has more supporting evidence should be > accepted as true" - yes, well, of course, that's such a simple test, isn't it? > Howard > > > > On 29 April 2011 09:02, Janice Gelb <janice.gelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Folks: > > A very useful flowchart on how to have a > rational discussion. Wish this could be required > reading on every mailing list/discussion forum/ > Facebook thread to which I belong, with members > required to sign a pledge to abide by it! > > http://atheismresource.com/wp-content/uploads/Debate-Flow-Chart1.jpg > > -- Janice > > ************************************************************** > Janice Gelb | The only connection Oracle has with > janice.gelb@xxxxxxxxxx | this message is the return address > ************************************************** > To view the austechwriter archives, go to > www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter > > To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes). > > To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) > go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter > > To contact the list administrator, send a message to > austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > ************************************************** >