[argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <profiling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:07:23 +0000
Hi :)
On 18/11/10 21:15, Graeme Gill wrote:
Does this scan any better ?
Note that this will only have an effect if an algorithm that uses
perceptual
placement (such as -R, -Q, -I or the default OFPS with an -A value >
0.0) is being used.
Yup, I think so. If I were to be *really* nit-picky I'd suggest that
there's quite a lot in the brackets separating "placement" and "is being
used", so it might be clearer to phrase it like so:
"Note that this will only have an effect when using an algorithm that
uses perceptual placement (such as -R, -Q, -I or the default OFPS with
an -A value > 0.0)."
(Note, though, that how the orignal sentence scanned wasn't the problem
as such - the confusion merely stemmed from an incomplete clause
following the "IF". Kind of interesting actually - there's a parallel
between how that sentence ends and writing "if(x) {...}" instead of
"if(x!=0) {...}"!)
All the best
--
Alastair M. Robinson
Other related posts:
