Alastair M. Robinson wrote:
You're right, there's a typo (or at least, a grammatical error) there. Both your suggested corrections would be correct because, as Graeme said, they're equivalent.
Does this scan any better ? Note that this will only have an effect if an algorithm that uses perceptual placement (such as -R, -Q, -I or the default OFPS with an -A value > 0.0) is being used. Graeme Gill.